Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sodic water sprinkler irrigation depth had no significant effect on Mg and Na concentration in wheat.

A claim from Effect of Sodic Water Sprinkler Irrigation Depth and Gypsum Levels on Yield and Mineral Composition of Wheat · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodic water sprinkler irrigation depth had no significant effect on Mg and Na concentration in wheat.

Treatment
sodic water sprinkler irrigation depthe0
Outcome
Mg and Na concentratione0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The depth of sodic water sprinkler irrigation depth had no significant effect on N, P, Mg and Na concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–617
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108

Title

Effect of Sodic Water Sprinkler Irrigation Depth and Gypsum Levels on Yield and Mineral Composition of Wheat

Sapna Yadav; Jagmohan Saini; Purushottam Sharma; et al. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2013

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-bf8364cd9d6ddbdf02a65fb31e59bcd6803ad27ad09d6631bcfe941ae12eb0ae · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

salinity · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 19 positive, 66 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this claim · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

76 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 74 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 74 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

94 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.