Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation at both CRI and pre-flowering stages gave the maximum CGR (6.7 gm -2 day -1).

A claim from Growth and yield response of wheat to irrigation at different growing stages · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at both CRI and pre-flowering stages gave the maximum CGR (6.7 gm -2 day -1).

Treatment
Irrigation at both CRI and pre-flowering stagee3
Outcome
CGRe2
Direction
Maximume2
Value
6.7 gm -2 day -1e2
Comparator
No irrigatione4
Setting
experimental field of Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Bangladeshe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“An experiment was conducted at the experimental field of Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–106
e2

“Maximum number of tiller/hill (5.2), CGR (6.7 gm -2 day -1 ), RGR (0.03 gg -1 day -1 ), dry matter content (28.7%), number of spikes/hill (4.5), number of spikelets/spike (19.0), ear length (17.5), filled grains/spike (30.8), total grains/spike (32.9), weight of 1000-grains (47.1 g), grain yield (3.9 tha -1 ), straw yield (4.9 tha -1 ), biological yield (8.8 tha -1 ) and harvest index (45.9%) were found from I3 whereas minimum from I0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–929
e3

“I3: Irrigation at both CRI and pre-flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–412
e4

“I0: No irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–248
t0

“Growth and yield response of wheat to irrigation at different growing stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76

Title

Growth and yield response of wheat to irrigation at different growing stages

Md. Shahidul Islam; Md. Shahidul Islam; Hasan Mehraj; et al. SSRN Electronic Journal 2015

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-c26f8e4670f6c20939697f6ee2d2dabc6eeccff55e6503132a7d2de915889ca4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

crown compound · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this claim · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

233 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.