Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same treatment gave the highest plant macronutrient uptake.

A claim from Effect of nutrient management on yield and quality of finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave the highest plant macronutrient uptake.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
150% RDF+ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray + FeSO4 0.2% foliar spraye1
Outcome
uptake of plant macronutrientse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest available soil macronutrients and uptake of plant macronutrients was also found in the same treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1382
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–67
e1

“150% RDF+ZnSO4 0.5% foliar spray + FeSO4 0.2% foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1229

Title

Effect of nutrient management on yield and quality of finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn)

Sandhya Rani Y; U Triveni; Patro Tssk; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2017

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-c3cc1da39e166dde5b86c7002e94896d15cbe6e4b46e9be68cc85f1c8d05a10e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.