Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The benefit-cost ratio was higher (2.6) in the same treatment.

A claim from Optimization of Irrigation and Fertigation Scheduling for Sustainable Sugarcane Initiative (SSI) through Subsurface Drip Irrigation in Western Zone of Tamil Nadu · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit-cost ratio was higher (2.6) in the same treatment.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
SSDI with 100per cent PE + 100 per cent RD of N&K through fertigatione0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.6e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–79
e0

“The net return (Rs. 2,09,405 per ha) and B:C ratio (2.6) was higher in SSDI with 100per cent PE + 100 per cent RD of N&K through fertigation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1605

Title

Optimization of Irrigation and Fertigation Scheduling for Sustainable Sugarcane Initiative (SSI) through Subsurface Drip Irrigation in Western Zone of Tamil Nadu

M. Manikandan; G. Thiyagarajan; S. Thenmozhi; et al. Current Agriculture Research Journal 2019. doi:10.12944/carj.7.1.14

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-c3f01f0cd3e2cee4e95b934cf425a106eb4057b480b4cde3fc187d1df0a277c1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Sub-surface irrigation at 100 per cent PE with manual hole placement of N, P and K improved sugarcane growth and yield attributes and yield over other combinations.

    Study on the effect of different irrigation and fertilizer application methods on yield and water use efficiency in sugarcane · 2022 · compared with other treatment combinations

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. no effect
    Drip-applied nitrogen yielded not significantly different sugarcane yields from sidedress application.

    Sugarcane Responses to Irrigation and Nitrogen in Semiarid South Texas · 2008 · compared with sidedress application

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Excess nitrogen lowered sugarcane yield.

    Different Amounts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Applications Alter the Bacterial Diversity and Community Structure in the Rhizosphere Soil of Sugarcane · 2021

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Reducing nitrogen from 120 to 80 kg N ha−1 had limited potential to lower yield by about 1%.

    Effect of previous soil management on sugarcane response to nitrogen fertilization · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Nitrogen above the yield optimum lowered sugar yields.

    Growth and yield responses to amending the sugarcane monoculture: interactions between break history and nitrogen fertiliser · 2014

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Urea applied on the surface gave significantly lower cane and sucrose yields than ammonium sulphate and sulphur-coated urea on a calcareous soil.

    Comparison of sulphur-coated urea and ammonium sulphate amended with N-Serve as sources of nitrogen for sugarcane · 1975 · compared with AS and SCU

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Urea formulation did not affect sugarcane yield at the same nitrogen application rate.

    Effects of urea formulation on sugarcane yield, nitrogen uptake and nitrous oxide emission in tropical Queensland. · 2014

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Nitrogen doses did not affect sugarcane stalk yield.

    Stalk yield and nitrogen (15N) recovery of irrigated sugarcane during the plant-cane cycle using urea · 2017

    Opposite direction

128 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

irrigation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 129 positive, 13 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Subsurface drip fertigation gave a mean cane yield of 113.9 t ha-1, significantly higher than surface irrigation with conventional fertilizer application (86.8 t ha-1).

    Effect of Subsurface Drip Fertigation on Cane Yield, Water Use Efficiency and Economics of Sugarcane · 2012 · compared with surface irrigation with conventional fertilizer application

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Drip irrigation at 60% PE with one lateral per row yielded 164.8 t ha-1, significantly higher.

    Evaluation of Irrigation Systems for Cost Reduction in Wide Spaced Sugarcane · 2011

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
    Sub-surface irrigation at 100 per cent PE with manual hole placement of N, P and K improved sugarcane growth and yield attributes and yield over other combinations.

    Study on the effect of different irrigation and fertilizer application methods on yield and water use efficiency in sugarcane · 2022 · compared with other treatment combinations

    Same directionCites this paper

  4. no effect
    Irrigation did not prove effective in mitigating climate change damage to South African sugarcane production.

    MEASURING THE IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON SOUTH AFRICAN AGRICULTURE: THE CASE OF SUGARCANE GROWING REGIONS · 2005

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Drip-applied nitrogen yielded not significantly different sugarcane yields from sidedress application.

    Sugarcane Responses to Irrigation and Nitrogen in Semiarid South Texas · 2008 · compared with sidedress application

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Plant height, tiller and stem counts, stem weight and sugar quality were reported unaffected by water regimes.

    Effects of Water Stress and Auxin Application on Growth and Yield of Two Sugarcane Cultivars under Greenhouse Conditions · 2021

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Drip irrigation produced lower average cane yields than overhead systems.

    Experience with drip irrigation on smallholder sugarcane irrigation schemes in Swaziland. · 2005 · compared with overhead systems

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Conventional surface irrigation with 100% RDF yielded lower tiller counts, 29.2 and 38.15.

    Influence of subsurface drip fertigation duration and levels on growth parameters of plant and ratoon sugarcane · 2017

    Opposite direction

133 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Subsurface drip fertigation gave a mean cane yield of 113.9 t ha-1, significantly higher than surface irrigation with conventional fertilizer application (86.8 t ha-1).

    Effect of Subsurface Drip Fertigation on Cane Yield, Water Use Efficiency and Economics of Sugarcane · 2012 · compared with surface irrigation with conventional fertilizer application

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Sub-surface irrigation at 100 per cent PE with manual hole placement of N, P and K improved sugarcane growth and yield attributes and yield over other combinations.

    Study on the effect of different irrigation and fertilizer application methods on yield and water use efficiency in sugarcane · 2022 · compared with other treatment combinations

    Same directionCites this paper

  3. no effect
    Fertilization did not increase yields when mill mud was added to plant cane.

    Sugarcane Response to Mill Mud, Fertilizer, and Soybean Nutrient Sources on a Sandy Soil · 2008

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Excess nitrogen lowered sugarcane yield.

    Different Amounts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Applications Alter the Bacterial Diversity and Community Structure in the Rhizosphere Soil of Sugarcane · 2021

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Subsoil and within-row compost did not affect cane or sugar yield versus control.

    Gypsum and Compost Effects on Sugarcane Root Growth, Yield, and Plant Nutrients · 2002 · compared with the control

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Magnesium fertilization did not affect yield at the reported soil magnesium level.

    Water and Nitrogen Management of Sugarcane Grown on Sandy, High‐Water‐Table Soil · 1998

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilization did not increase sugarcane agricultural productivity.

    Productivity and technological quality of sugarcane under fertilization of nitrogen and molybdenum · 2018

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Planting fertilizer percentages did not increase productivity at Morrinhos-GO.

    Yield and biometry of fertilized sugar cane with organomineral fertilizer of sewage sludge and biostimulant · 2020

    Opposite direction

337 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.