Intervention effectmodel-written summary

RDF + soil application of ZnSO₄ @ 20 kg/ha + 0.5% FeSO₄ foliar spray at 45 days after sowing (DAS) significantly enhanced protein content (11.58%).

A claim from Agronomic biofortification with iron and zinc for enhancement in yield and quality of maize (Zea mays L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF + soil application of ZnSO₄ @ 20 kg/ha + 0.5% FeSO₄ foliar spray at 45 days after sowing (DAS) significantly enhanced protein content (11.58%).

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
DHM 117e1
Treatment
RDF + soil application of ZnSO₄ @ 20 kg/ha + 0.5% FeSO₄ foliar spray at 45 days after sowing (DAS)e0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
11.58%e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that the treatment RDF + soil application of ZnSO₄ @ 20 kg/ha + 0.5% FeSO₄ foliar spray at 45 days after sowing (DAS) significantly enhanced plant population (8.28 plants/m row at 30 DAS), plant height (up to 55.9% increase at harvest), dry matter accumulation (up to 67.12% increase), yield attributes (e.g., 57.85% more grains/cob), grain yield (87.85% increase to 74.84 q/ha), nutrient content and uptake (N, P, K increases of 108%, 154%, and 144% in grain), protein content (11.58% increase), and economic returns (net return of ₹102,715/ha, B:C ratio 1.77)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–1045
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91
e1

“maize (Zea mays L.) hybrid DHM 117”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–270

Title

Agronomic biofortification with iron and zinc for enhancement in yield and quality of maize (Zea mays L.)

Meena B; Choudhary BL; Bhagora D International Journal of Agriculture and Nutrition 2025. doi:10.33545/26646064.2025.v7.i8b.278

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-c5d55da645f021fc2a68ebd9f02bb24b2325a10b640b87774040b0c55a02f498 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 61 positive, 1 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.