Intervention effectmodel-written summary

A 0.2% Gumavit solution improved seed sowing quality.

A claim from Efficiency of Application of Liquid Fertilizer Gumavit When Sprouting Seeds · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 0.2% Gumavit solution improved seed sowing quality.

Taxon
barley seeds, wheat and tomatoesSolanum lycopersicumHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
0.2% (of humic acids - HA) Gumavit solutione0
Outcome
sowing qualitye0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“barley seeds, wheat and tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–374
e0

“The use of a 0.2% (of humic acids - HA) Gumavit solution had a positive effect on the sowing quality of the studied cultures’ seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–700

Title

Efficiency of Application of Liquid Fertilizer Gumavit When Sprouting Seeds

Varvara V. Gamaga; Igor V. Iudaev; Svetlana A. Rodionova; et al. KnE Life Sciences 2021. doi:10.18502/kls.v0i0.8928

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-c7ed36d0ccd5dad6829299814bd688a797645883909e81b3fd65af5bcddea4c0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

other · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

other · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

other · quality: general · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.