Paper · 2005 · HortScience

Fertility and Weed Management Effects on Crop Quality and Disease Variables in a Transitional-organic Processing Cabbage and Tomato System

Annette Wszelaki; Sally Miller; Douglas Doohan; et al.

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The influence of organic soil amendments (unamended control, composted dairy manure, or raw dairy manure) and weed treatments [critical period (CP) or no seed threshold (NST)] on diseases, growth parameters, yield, and postharvest quality was evaluated over 3 years in a transitional organic crop rotation of tomato, cabbage, clover, and wheat. More growth, yield, and postharvest quality parameters were affected by amendment treatments in cabbage than in tomato. Significant differences in yield among amendment treatments were found in 2001 and 2003 in cabbage, with higher marketable and total yields in amended vs. control plots. Soil management effects on cabbage varied annually, though amendments were required to maximize crop growth, as head weight, size, and volume and core volume of treatment plots exceeded the control plots in 2002 and 2003. Few differences were found between weed treatments, although in 2001 cabbage heads from the NST treatment were larger than heads from the CP treatment. Similar results were found in tomato in 2003. Also, the CP treatment had a higher Area Under the Disease Progress Curve than the NST treatment in tomato in 2003. Overall, disease pressure was highest in tomato in 2001. But disease levels within years were mostly unaffected by amendment treatments. In cabbage, disease was more common in 2002 than in 2003, although head rot was more prevalent in compost-amended plots in 2003 than in manure-amended or control plots. Tomato postharvest quality parameters were similar among amendment and weed treatments within each year. Soil amendment may enhance crop yield and quality in a transitional-organic system. Also, weed management strategy can alter weed populations and perhaps disease levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More growth, yield and postharvest quality parameters were affected by amendment treatments in cabbage than in tomato.

Outcome
growth, yield, and postharvest quality parameterse0
Qualifier
than in tomatoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More growth, yield, and postharvest quality parameters were affected by amendment treatments in cabbage than in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In cabbage, marketable and total yields were higher in amended than in control plots, with significant differences in 2001 and 2003.

Treatment
amendment treatmentse0
Outcome
marketable and total yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
2001 and 2003e0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences in yield among amendment treatments were found in 2001 and 2003 in cabbage, with higher marketable and total yields in amended vs. control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In cabbage, head weight, size and volume of amended plots exceeded the control plots in 2002 and 2003.

Treatment
amendmentse0
Outcome
head weight, size, and volumee0
Direction
exceedede0
Qualifier
2002 and 2003e0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil management effects on cabbage varied annually, though amendments were required to maximize crop growth, as head weight, size, and volume and core volume of treatment plots exceeded the control plots in 2002 and 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In cabbage, core volume of amended plots exceeded the control plots in 2002 and 2003.

Treatment
amendmentse0
Outcome
core volumee0
Direction
exceedede0
Qualifier
2002 and 2003e0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil management effects on cabbage varied annually, though amendments were required to maximize crop growth, as head weight, size, and volume and core volume of treatment plots exceeded the control plots in 2002 and 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2001, cabbage heads from the no seed threshold (NST) weed treatment were larger than heads from the critical period (CP) treatment.

Treatment
NST treatmente0
Outcome
headse0
Direction
largere0
Qualifier
in 2001e0
Comparator
CP treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2001 cabbage heads from the NST treatment were larger than heads from the CP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In tomato in 2003, the CP weed treatment had a higher Area Under the Disease Progress Curve than the NST treatment.

Treatment
CP treatmente0
Outcome
Area Under the Disease Progress Curvee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in 2003e0
Comparator
NST treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the CP treatment had a higher Area Under the Disease Progress Curve than the NST treatment in tomato in 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1169 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease pressure was highest in tomato in 2001.

Outcome
disease pressuree0
Qualifier
in 2001e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease pressure was highest in tomato in 2001”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease levels within years were mostly unaffected by amendment treatments.

Treatment
amendment treatmentse0
Outcome
disease levelse0
Direction
unaffectede0
Qualifier
mostlye0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“disease levels within years were mostly unaffected by amendment treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1306 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In cabbage, disease was more common in 2002 than in 2003.

Outcome
diseasee0
Qualifier
more common in 2002 than in 2003e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In cabbage, disease was more common in 2002 than in 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In cabbage in 2003, head rot was more prevalent in compost-amended plots than in manure-amended or control plots.

Treatment
compost-amended plotse0
Outcome
head rote0
Direction
more prevalente0
Qualifier
in 2003e0
Comparator
manure-amended or control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In cabbage, disease was more common in 2002 than in 2003, although head rot was more prevalent in compost-amended plots in 2003 than in manure-amended or control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato postharvest quality parameters were similar among amendment and weed treatments within each year.

Treatment
amendment and weed treatmentse0
Outcome
postharvest quality parameterse0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
within each yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato postharvest quality parameters were similar among amendment and weed treatments within each year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1580 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that soil amendment may enhance crop yield and quality in a transitional-organic system.

Taxon
crope0
Treatment
Soil amendmente0
Outcome
crop yield and qualitye0
Qualifier
transitional-organic systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“Soil amendment may enhance crop yield and quality in a transitional-organic system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1582–1664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors state that weed management strategy can alter weed populations and perhaps disease levels.

Treatment
weed management strategye0
Outcome
weed populations and perhaps disease levelse0
Direction
altere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“weed management strategy can alter weed populations and perhaps disease levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1750 · show in text ↑

other · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

37 papers: 33 positive, 4 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

fertilization · disease · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

other · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

other · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.