Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar byproduct fertilization increased maize N and K uptake.

A claim from Effect of Foliar Application of Beet Vinasse on Maize Yield · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar byproduct fertilization increased maize N and K uptake.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
foliar fertilization with a byproducte0
Outcome
macronutrients N and K uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar fertilization with a byproduct rich in fulvic acids, but also containing macro- and micronutrients, increased the leaf concentration of micronutrients Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn, and macronutrients N and K uptake by plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1252
t0

“Maize Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–59

Title

Effect of Foliar Application of Beet Vinasse on Maize Yield

M. Tejada; J. L. Gonzalez Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 2006. doi:10.1080/01448765.2006.9755019

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-c8a93d70bce9c7193df131ff82f37ee883cc9fe426c99946dde7279c066a2255 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

152 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this claim · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

1,155 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.