Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus recovery efficiency increased by 0.01% ∼ 22.0%.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- SDFe1
- Outcome
- P recovery efficiency (PRE)e0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Value
- 0.01% ∼ 22.0%e0
- Comparator
- D0e1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it enhanced N recovery efficiency (NRE) by 20.0% ∼ 36.7% and P recovery efficiency (PRE) by 0.01% ∼ 22.0%.”
e1“Compared with D0, SDF increased the biomass by 10.6% ∼ 36.3%, and yields by 5.77% ∼ 21.35%.”
t0“rice”
Title
Kun Hou; Ping Liu; Rusheng Xiao; et al. Agricultural Environment and Sustainability 2026. doi:10.1016/j.ages.2026.100018
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Intervention effect Side-depth fertilization increased soil nitrogen and phosphorus in the tillage layer versus surface fertilization.
- Intervention effect Side-depth fertilization reduced deep-root distribution.
- Intervention effect Root weight decreased by 0.2% ∼ 28.2%.
- Intervention effect Root-shoot ratio decreased by 5.0% ∼ 15.9%.
- Intervention effect Tillering increased by 8.42% ∼ 25.6%.
- Intervention effect Net photosynthetic rate increased by 0.18% ∼ 16.86%.
- Mechanism SDF root and canopy adjustments promoted dry-matter accumulation and yield formation.
- Intervention effect Biomass increased by 10.6% ∼ 36.3%.
- Intervention effect Yield increased by 5.77% ∼ 21.35%.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen recovery efficiency increased by 20.0% ∼ 36.7%.
- Intervention effect D10 and D5 did not significantly differ in above-ground biomass, NRE and PRE.
- Intervention effect D10 retained nutrients more strongly than D5.
- Intervention effect D10 had less deep root distribution than D5.
- Intervention effect D10 showed greater potential for fertilizer reduction than D5.