Claim · model-written summary
Mulching increased nutrient uptake and economics versus minimum and zero tillage.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- Mulching practicee0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptake and economicse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- minimum and zero tillage practicese0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mulching practice showed higher growth, yield and yield parameters of chickpea and also nutrient uptake and economics over minimum and zero tillage practices.”
Title
B.R. Manjith Kumar; S.S. Angadi1 Legume Research - An International Journal 2016. doi:10.18805/lr.v0iof.3552
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage raised chickpea growth, yield components and yield versus minimum and zero tillage.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage raised nutrient uptake and nitrogen-use efficiency versus minimum and zero tillage.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage produced significantly higher gross return, net return and benefit-cost ratio.
- Intervention effect Mulching increased chickpea growth, yield and yield components versus minimum and zero tillage.
- Intervention effect Pendimethalin significantly raised chickpea growth, yield and yield components compared with other weed-management practices.
- Intervention effect Pendimethalin significantly raised nutrient uptake versus other weed-management practices.
- Intervention effect Pendimethalin significantly raised gross and net returns and benefit-cost ratio versus other weed-management practices.