Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Down-DI and Up-DI fruit did not differ significantly in capacity to accumulate carbohydrates.

A claim from Effects of relative source-sink position within peach trees on fruit growth under water stress conditions · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Down-DI and Up-DI fruit did not differ significantly in capacity to accumulate carbohydrates.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Down-DIe0
Outcome
capacity to accumulate carbohydratese0
Direction
did not exhibit significant differencese0
Comparator
Up-DIe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits on Down-DI trees did not exhibit significant differences in their capacity to accumulate carbohydrates with respect to Up-DI fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1601–1740
t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–59

Title

Effects of relative source-sink position within peach trees on fruit growth under water stress conditions

G. Lopez; J. Girona; J. Del Campo; et al. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 2007. doi:10.1080/14620316.2007.11512211

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-ca220e5997b4d093b0092fc6a52ec0469aa6071798d42d3a80ed937429cdeb32 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    After cold storage, deficit irrigated peach fruit had lower TA than controls.

    Effects of stage II and postharvest deficit irrigation on peach quality during maturation and after cold storage · 2004 · compared with Control fruits

    No difference from an alternative

  2. positive
    Fruit from the RDI treatments had significantly higher soluble solids concentrations and red colour at harvest than control fruit.

    Effects of water deficit during stage II of peach fruit development and postharvest on fruit quality and ethylene production · 2003 · compared with control fruit

    No difference from an alternative

  3. positive
    Deficit irrigation increased peach soluble solids at harvest.

    Deficit irrigation strategies combined with controlled atmosphere preserve quality in early peaches · 2014

    No difference from an alternative

  4. positive
    Initially, deficit-irrigated nectarines had higher soluble solids than control and over-irrigated fruit.

    Combined effects of deficit irrigation and fresh-cut processing on quality and bioactive compounds of nectarines · 2015 · compared with control and over-irrigated fruits

    No difference from an alternative

  5. positive
    Peach sugar to acid ratio increased under deficit irrigation in the first year.

    YIELD AND FRUIT QUALITY OF ALMOND, PEACH AND PLUM UNDER REGULATED DEFICIT IRRIGATION · 2020

    No difference from an alternative

  6. positive
    Fertigation at 100% RD of NPK with 100% ETc irrigation significantly increased TSS to the reported value.

    Effect of fertigation on growth, yield, fruit quality and fertilizer-use efficiency of peach · 2017

    No difference from an alternative

  7. positive
    APRI increased total soluble solids.

    Influences of partial root-zone irrigation on the growth and development,yield,and quality of nectarine in greenhouse · 2005

    No difference from an alternative

  8. positive
    Uni-sal at 6 L/feddan with sprinkler irrigation gave maximum TSS, ascorbic acid and TSS/acidity ratio compared with control.

    Mitigation adverse effects of salt stress on Prunus persica L Florida prince peach cultivar · 2023 · compared with control

    No difference from an alternative

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.