Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fertigation at 100% RD of NPK with 100% ETc irrigation significantly increased TSS to the reported value.

A claim from Effect of fertigation on growth, yield, fruit quality and fertilizer-use efficiency of peach · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation at 100% RD of NPK with 100% ETc irrigation significantly increased TSS to the reported value.

Material
Redhavene1
Treatment
fertigation at 100% of RD of NPK and drip irrigation at 100% ETce0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.07°Be0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that treatment combination of fertigation at 100% of RD of NPK and drip irrigation at 100% ETc significantly increased tree height (18.61%), tree spread (16.97%), trunk girth (14.80%), annual shoot growth (116.80 cm), yield (19.14 kg/tree), proportion of three layer grade fruits (87.72%), fruit length (6.79 cm), diameter (6.33 cm), weight (119.32 g), volume (125.52 cc) and TSS (13.07°B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–931
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92
e1

“peach cv. Redhaven”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–213

Title

Effect of fertigation on growth, yield, fruit quality and fertilizer-use efficiency of peach

Pramod Verma; JS Chandel; NC Sharma; et al. Journal of Hill Agriculture 2017. doi:10.5958/2230-7338.2017.00033.7

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-c76683b93bf424b3b31345cbb3db6b90934a629169a5af70bfce9896bfcdf03e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.