Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fertigation at 100% RD of NPK with 100% ETc irrigation significantly increased diameter to the reported value.

A claim from Effect of fertigation on growth, yield, fruit quality and fertilizer-use efficiency of peach · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertigation at 100% RD of NPK with 100% ETc irrigation significantly increased diameter to the reported value.

Material
Redhavene1
Treatment
fertigation at 100% of RD of NPK and drip irrigation at 100% ETce0
Outcome
diametere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.33 cme0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that treatment combination of fertigation at 100% of RD of NPK and drip irrigation at 100% ETc significantly increased tree height (18.61%), tree spread (16.97%), trunk girth (14.80%), annual shoot growth (116.80 cm), yield (19.14 kg/tree), proportion of three layer grade fruits (87.72%), fruit length (6.79 cm), diameter (6.33 cm), weight (119.32 g), volume (125.52 cc) and TSS (13.07°B)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–931
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–92
e1

“peach cv. Redhaven”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–213

Title

Effect of fertigation on growth, yield, fruit quality and fertilizer-use efficiency of peach

Pramod Verma; JS Chandel; NC Sharma; et al. Journal of Hill Agriculture 2017. doi:10.5958/2230-7338.2017.00033.7

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-a8cc3d7e7907f5c7cf4475d24d975f309d7399fa837701903b00246d8b889267 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 33 positive, 3 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

irrigation · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 24 positive, 19 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.