Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 100% P2O5 through DAP treatment recorded the highest root biomass of chickpea (1.60gm).

A claim from Integrated phosphorus management using PROM and inorganic fertilizers for enhanced growth, yield, and nutrient uptake of chickpea in inceptisol · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% P2O5 through DAP treatment recorded the highest root biomass of chickpea (1.60gm).

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% P2O5 through Di-ammonium phosphate (DAP)e1
Outcome
root biomasse1
Direction
higheste1
Value
1.60gme1
Setting
Agronomy Farm, College of Agriculture, Kolhapure0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“nutrient uptake of chickpea in inceptisol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–143
e0

“was conducted during Rabi 2024-25 at the Agronomy Farm, College of Agriculture, Kolhapur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–360
e1

“the treatment T3; 100% P2O5 through Di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) recorded the highest plant height at harvest (40.33 cm), active root nodules plant-1 at 50% flowering (41.27), root length (14.03cm), root biomass(1.60gm), grain yield (22.12 q ha⁻¹), straw yield (25.1 q ha⁻¹), and total nutrient uptake for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (92.49, 17.80 and 51.48 respectively) were observed in the same treatment T3; 100% P2O5 through DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1478

Title

Integrated phosphorus management using PROM and inorganic fertilizers for enhanced growth, yield, and nutrient uptake of chickpea in inceptisol

SS Jagtap; VR Gaikwad; PN Gajbhiye; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2025. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2025.v8.i9q.3934

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-ca4a6281e5b80799524c51a8e4f04c51114ffa31f9a5d7cd94ddf7feba6e35c3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

diammonium hydrogen phosphate · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Seed-contact or 2 cm sub-seed DAP suppressed chickpea emergence and early growth in sandy soil.

    EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER PLACEMENT ON EMERGENCE AND EARLY GROWTH OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2022

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Normal animal manure with half DAP increased chickpea primary branches by up to 78.5% versus control.

    Combined Effect of Animal Manures and Di-Ammonium Phosphate (DAP) on Growth, Physiology, Root Nodulation and Yield of Chickpea · 2022 · compared with control

    Same direction

  3. positive
    The 50 kg DAP/ha basal plus 50 kg DAP/ha foliar treatment with PSB increased plant height, primary branches and leaf area of chickpea.

    Effect of basal and foliar application of diammonium phosphate in cognizance with phosphate-solubilizing bacteria on growth, yield and quality of rainfed chickpea (Cicer arietinum) · 2024

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Di-ammonium phosphate produced the largest number of secondary branches per plant versus control.

    Response of two Chickpea genotypes to different fertilizers composition and different application forms · 2021 · compared with control treatment

    Same direction

See all 5 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

58 papers: 55 positive, 3 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    At site 2, chickpea showed no growth response to applied phosphorus.

    Phosphorus nutrition of large-seeded chickpea cv. Macarena ( Cicer arietinum ) in the Ord River Irrigation Area, Western Australia · 1994

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Application of P did not significantly affect chickpea plant height or dry weights in either soil.

    Effect of Phosphorus and Ryzelan on the Growth and Mineral Composition of Chickpeas1 · 1975

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Seed-contact or 2 cm sub-seed TSP suppressed chickpea emergence and early growth in sandy soil.

    EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER PLACEMENT ON EMERGENCE AND EARLY GROWTH OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2022

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Bacterial inoculation significantly increased chickpea growth, shoot phosphorus and nitrogen, nodulation and nitrogenase activity.

    Phosphorus uptake and growth promotion of chickpea by co-inoculation of mineral phosphate solubilising bacteria and a mixed rhizobial culture · 2004

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Phosphorus enhanced vegetative growth of chickpea.

    Nitrogen and phosphorus fertility management for desi and kabuli chickpea · 2005

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Rhizobium + PSB inoculation was the most effective microbial inoculant for shoot dry weight in chickpea

    Effect ofRhizobiumand Phosphate Solubilizing Bacterial Inoculants on Symbiotic Traits, Nodule Leghemoglobin, and Yield of Chickpea Genotypes · 2013 · compared with microbial inoculants

    Same direction

  7. positive
    PR treatments had higher relative agronomic effectiveness for shoot DM than SP.

    Phosphorus source, organic matter, and arbuscular mycorrhiza effects on growth and mineral acquisition of chickpea grown in acidic soil · 2000 · compared with SP

    Same direction

  8. positive
    RP, PM and MN-54 raised shoot length by 37.5% versus controls.

    Improving Nutrient Uptake, Growth, Yield and Protein Content in Chickpea by the Co-Addition of Phosphorus Fertilizers, Organic Manures, and Bacillus sp. MN-54 · 2021 · compared with control treatments

    Same direction

49 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.