Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Photoperiod did not affect height in rice accession 4237.

A claim from Photoperiod sensitivity of very early maturing Sri Lankan rice for flowering time and plant architecture · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photoperiod did not affect height in rice accession 4237.

Material
4237e0
Treatment
Photoperiode0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photoperiod did not affect plant height in accession 4237 and Bg 379-2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1263
t0

“Sri Lankan rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–62

Title

Photoperiod sensitivity of very early maturing Sri Lankan rice for flowering time and plant architecture

Duwini Padukkage; Gamini Senanayake; Sudarshanee Geekiyanage Open Agriculture 2017. doi:10.1515/opag-2017-0061

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-cc3e09eb9c8d4e476278716bf39409ea74a595b73db9a0f24f71bec939824087 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

light · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 55 positive, 40 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this claim · 55 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.