Intervention effectmodel-written summary

DSE interaction increased rice dry matter accumulation in full grain and panicle.

A claim from Dark Septate Endophytic Fungi Increase Green Manure-15N Recovery Efficiency, N Contents, and Micronutrients in Rice Grains · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSE interaction increased rice dry matter accumulation in full grain and panicle.

Organ / stage
full grain and paniclee0
Treatment
DSEe0
Interactor
DSEe0symbiont
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in a higher accumulation of crude protein and dry matter in the full grain and panicle of DSE-rice interaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1772
t0

“Dark Septate Endophytic Fungi Increase Green Manure-15N Recovery Efficiency, N Contents, and Micronutrients in Rice Grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–122
e1

“the inoculation of rice with DSE fungi represents a strategy to improve green manure-N recovery, grain yield per plant, and grain quality in terms of micronutrients contents in cropping systems with a low N input”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2029–2241

Title

Dark Septate Endophytic Fungi Increase Green Manure-15N Recovery Efficiency, N Contents, and Micronutrients in Rice Grains

Carlos Vergara; Karla E. C. Araujo; Segundo Urquiaga; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2018. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00613

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-526f5f23febd696fd2732b0ab75f4b5d084ce6f1403c7993c4d0a0238c742538 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

light · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 55 positive, 40 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this claim · 38 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

86 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.