Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under dryland, corn yield was maximized at an apparent soil N supply of 350 lb N/a.

A claim from Yield Response to Nitrogen Management in a Corn-Soybean Sequence in North Central Kansas · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under dryland, corn yield was maximized at an apparent soil N supply of 350 lb N/a.

Treatment
apparent soil N supply level of 350 lb N/ae1
Outcome
corn yieldse1
Direction
maximume1
Setting
drylande1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Yield Response to Nitrogen Management in a Corn-Soybean Sequence in North Central Kansas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88
e1

“Under dryland, maximum corn yields were achieved with an apparent soil N supply level of 350 lb N/a (fertilizer N plus soil N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–626

Title

Yield Response to Nitrogen Management in a Corn-Soybean Sequence in North Central Kansas

A. A. Correndo; I. A. Ciampitti Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports 2021. doi:10.4148/2378-5977.8083

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-ce245e964351bb327c566149e0ac3d25172ee53c1e35c937616fd0ee666da55e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this claim · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

2,176 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.