Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Yeast extract spraying raised P uptake of faba bean by 56% over non-treated plants.

A claim from EFFECTS OF SOIL APPLICATION OF DIFFERENT FERTILIZERS AND FOLIAR SPRAY WITH YEAST EXTRACT ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF FABA BEAN PLANTS · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yeast extract spraying raised P uptake of faba bean by 56% over non-treated plants.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
sprayed by yeast extracte2
Outcome
uptake of N, P and Ke2
Direction
highere2
Value
56e2
Qualifier
Pe2
Comparator
non-treated onese2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“EFFECTS OF SOIL APPLICATION OF DIFFERENT FERTILIZERS AND FOLIAR SPRAY WITH YEAST EXTRACT ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF FABA BEAN PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–128
e2

“The uptake of N, P and K by faba bean plants sprayed by yeast extract were 32, 56 and 27%, respectively, higher than those of the non-treated ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–574

Title

EFFECTS OF SOIL APPLICATION OF DIFFERENT FERTILIZERS AND FOLIAR SPRAY WITH YEAST EXTRACT ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF FABA BEAN PLANTS

A. Abdel-Gawad; M. Youssef Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Sciences /Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2019. doi:10.21608/ejarc.2019.211138

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-cfaf7c86ff01a6e7dbf8100397871ae747e3104b0b94c2d81a6e0586feaec3e1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

application · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

botanical · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.