Paper · 2008 · Journal of Plant Production

FABA BEAN GROWTH AND YIELD AS AFFECTED BY APPLICATION METHODS OF IRON OR MANGANESE

Fatma Abdo; Sabah Attia

19
claims
40
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out at Giza experimental Station, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), during 2004/2005 and 2005/2006 seasons. The main objective was to study the effect of either iron (Fe) or manganese (Mn) application methods, viz. seed coating at rates of 0.2 g Fe or 0.3 g Mn / 1 kg seed, foliar application at 200 ppm Fe or 300 ppm Mn 45 days after sowing (DAS) and the combination of both methods on growth, yield and seed quality of Giza 40 and Nubaria 1 faba bean cultivars. The split plot design with three replications was used. Results showed that Giza 40 produced significantly taller plants at 64, 85, 106 and 127 DAS. It was also superior in plant shoot dry weight at 64 and 85 DAS. The same trend was true at harvest regarding pod number / plant in both seasons. However, Nubaria 1 surpassed Giza 40 in plant shoot dry weight at 106 and 127 DAS. In addition, Nubaria 1 was superior to Giza 40 in leaf area (LA) / plant at all growth ages, 100-seed weight, seed weight / plant, seed and straw yields / feddan as well as seed crude protein, Fe and Mn contents. All treatments induced significant increases over the control in all investigated yield traits in both seasons. Foliar application of Fe was the most effective treatment in this respect followed by foliar application of Mn. The average increases due to foliar application of Fe were 20.4, 42.8, 14.2 and 23.2 % for number of pods / plant, seed weight / plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield / feddan, respectively compared with control. Results also indicated that foliar application of either Fe or Mn could have improved yield and seed quality traits. The improvement in seed protein, total carbohydrate, Fe and Mn contents due to foliar application over coating or coating + spraying methods were 4.8 and 3.9 % for crude protein, 6.1 and 5.5 % for total carbohydrates, 11.1 and 7.5 % for Fe and 10.4 and 7.2 % for Mn, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 40 produced significantly taller faba bean plants than Nubaria 1 at 64, 85, 106 and 127 DAS.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Giza 40e0
Outcome
taller plantse0
Direction
tallere0
Qualifier
at 64, 85, 106 and 127 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“Giza 40 produced significantly taller plants at 64, 85, 106 and 127 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–644 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 40 was superior in plant shoot dry weight at 64 and 85 DAS.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Giza 40e0
Outcome
plant shoot dry weighte1
Direction
superiore1
Qualifier
at 64 and 85 DASe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“Giza 40 produced significantly taller plants at 64, 85, 106 and 127 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–644 · show in text ↑
e1

“It was also superior in plant shoot dry weight at 64 and 85 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–709 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 40 also had more pods per plant at harvest in both seasons.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Giza 40e0
Outcome
pod number / plante1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Qualifier
in both seasonse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“Giza 40 produced significantly taller plants at 64, 85, 106 and 127 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–644 · show in text ↑
e1

“The same trend was true at harvest regarding pod number / plant in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–790 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nubaria 1 surpassed Giza 40 in plant shoot dry weight at 106 and 127 DAS.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Nubaria 1e0
Outcome
plant shoot dry weighte0
Direction
surpassede0
Qualifier
at 106 and 127 DASe0
Comparator
Giza 40e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nubaria 1 surpassed Giza 40 in plant shoot dry weight at 106 and 127 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–873 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nubaria 1 was superior to Giza 40 in leaf area per plant at all growth ages.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Nubaria 1e0
Outcome
leaf area (LA) / plant at all growth agese0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Giza 40e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nubaria 1 was superior to Giza 40 in leaf area (LA) / plant at all growth ages, 100-seed weight, seed weight / plant, seed and straw yields / feddan as well as seed crude protein, Fe and Mn contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1086 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nubaria 1 was superior to Giza 40 in 100-seed weight and seed weight per plant.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Nubaria 1e0
Outcome
100-seed weight, seed weight / plante0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Giza 40e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nubaria 1 was superior to Giza 40 in leaf area (LA) / plant at all growth ages, 100-seed weight, seed weight / plant, seed and straw yields / feddan as well as seed crude protein, Fe and Mn contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1086 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nubaria 1 was superior to Giza 40 in seed and straw yields per feddan.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Nubaria 1e0
Outcome
seed and straw yields / feddane0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Giza 40e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nubaria 1 was superior to Giza 40 in leaf area (LA) / plant at all growth ages, 100-seed weight, seed weight / plant, seed and straw yields / feddan as well as seed crude protein, Fe and Mn contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1086 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nubaria 1 was superior to Giza 40 in seed crude protein, Fe and Mn contents.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Material
Nubaria 1e0
Outcome
seed crude protein, Fe and Mn contentse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Giza 40e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nubaria 1 was superior to Giza 40 in leaf area (LA) / plant at all growth ages, 100-seed weight, seed weight / plant, seed and straw yields / feddan as well as seed crude protein, Fe and Mn contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All Fe and Mn application treatments significantly increased all investigated yield traits over the control in both seasons.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
All treatmentse0
Outcome
all investigated yield traitse0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“All treatments induced significant increases over the control in all investigated yield traits in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of Fe was the most effective treatment for yield traits, followed by foliar application of Mn.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Foliar application of Fee0
Outcome
the most effective treatmente0
Direction
the most effective treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar application of Fe was the most effective treatment in this respect followed by foliar application of Mn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Fe application increased number of pods / plant by 20.4 % compared with control.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
foliar application of Fee0
Outcome
number of pods / plante0
Direction
increasese0
Value
20.4e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“The average increases due to foliar application of Fe were 20.4, 42.8, 14.2 and 23.2 % for number of pods / plant, seed weight / plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield / feddan, respectively compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Fe application increased seed weight / plant by 42.8 % compared with control.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
foliar application of Fee0
Outcome
seed weight / plante0
Direction
increasese0
Value
42.8e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“The average increases due to foliar application of Fe were 20.4, 42.8, 14.2 and 23.2 % for number of pods / plant, seed weight / plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield / feddan, respectively compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Fe application increased 100-seed weight by 14.2 % compared with control.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
foliar application of Fee0
Outcome
100-seed weighte0
Direction
increasese0
Value
14.2e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“The average increases due to foliar application of Fe were 20.4, 42.8, 14.2 and 23.2 % for number of pods / plant, seed weight / plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield / feddan, respectively compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Fe application increased seed yield / feddan by 23.2 % compared with control.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
foliar application of Fee0
Outcome
seed yield / feddane0
Direction
increasese0
Value
23.2 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“The average increases due to foliar application of Fe were 20.4, 42.8, 14.2 and 23.2 % for number of pods / plant, seed weight / plant, 100-seed weight and seed yield / feddan, respectively compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of either Fe or Mn could have improved yield and seed quality traits.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
foliar application of either Fe or Mne0
Outcome
yield and seed quality traitse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results also indicated that foliar application of either Fe or Mn could have improved yield and seed quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application improved seed crude protein content over coating or coating + spraying by 4.8 and 3.9 %, respectively.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
foliar applicatione0
Outcome
crude proteine0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
4.8 and 3.9 %e0
Comparator
coating or coating + spraying methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“The improvement in seed protein, total carbohydrate, Fe and Mn contents due to foliar application over coating or coating + spraying methods were 4.8 and 3.9 % for crude protein, 6.1 and 5.5 % for total carbohydrates, 11.1 and 7.5 % for Fe and 10.4 and 7.2 % for Mn, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1642–1921 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application improved seed total carbohydrates content over coating or coating + spraying by 6.1 and 5.5 %, respectively.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
foliar applicatione0
Outcome
total carbohydratese0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
6.1 and 5.5 %e0
Comparator
coating or coating + spraying methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“The improvement in seed protein, total carbohydrate, Fe and Mn contents due to foliar application over coating or coating + spraying methods were 4.8 and 3.9 % for crude protein, 6.1 and 5.5 % for total carbohydrates, 11.1 and 7.5 % for Fe and 10.4 and 7.2 % for Mn, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1642–1921 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application improved seed Fe content over coating or coating + spraying by 11.1 and 7.5 %, respectively.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
foliar applicatione0
Outcome
Fee0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
11.1 and 7.5 %e0
Comparator
coating or coating + spraying methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“The improvement in seed protein, total carbohydrate, Fe and Mn contents due to foliar application over coating or coating + spraying methods were 4.8 and 3.9 % for crude protein, 6.1 and 5.5 % for total carbohydrates, 11.1 and 7.5 % for Fe and 10.4 and 7.2 % for Mn, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1642–1921 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application improved seed Mn content over coating or coating + spraying by 10.4 and 7.2 %, respectively.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
foliar applicatione0
Outcome
Mne0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
10.4 and 7.2 %e0
Comparator
coating or coating + spraying methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“FABA BEAN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
e0

“The improvement in seed protein, total carbohydrate, Fe and Mn contents due to foliar application over coating or coating + spraying methods were 4.8 and 3.9 % for crude protein, 6.1 and 5.5 % for total carbohydrates, 11.1 and 7.5 % for Fe and 10.4 and 7.2 % for Mn, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1642–1921 · show in text ↑

iron atom · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

application · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 110 positive, 6 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

application · quality: grain · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.