Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Phosphorus 40 kg/ha plus iron 5kg/ha gave the highest number of branches per plant.

A claim from Effect of Phosphorus and Iron on Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum var. kabulium) · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus 40 kg/ha plus iron 5kg/ha gave the highest number of branches per plant.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
phosphorus 40 kg/ha + Iron 5kg/hae0
Outcome
number of branches per plante0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.33e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of phosphorus 40 kg/ha + Iron 5kg/ha recorded highest plant height (69.10 cm), plant dry weight (25.00 g/plant) number of branches per plant (2.33)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–945
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–61

Title

Effect of Phosphorus and Iron on Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum var. kabulium)

Telugu Pragna Susan; Victor Debbarma International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 2022. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2022/v12i1131274

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-cfedd35bc4fcc528d7860698b15a1b915ceaac7de0dab27beb040f0913fe29d5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

iron atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 161 positive, 7 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

159 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.