Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigated trees had a much greater cumulative fruit yield over 12 cropping years than trees in the narrow bare-soil strip system

A claim from Effects of alley sward width, irrigation and nitrogen fertiliser on growth and yield of Cox's orange pippin apple trees · 1990

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigated trees had a much greater cumulative fruit yield over 12 cropping years than trees in the narrow bare-soil strip system

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
irrigatione3
Outcome
cumulative yield of fruite3
Direction
much greatere3
Qualifier
over 12 cropping yearse3
Comparator
narrow bare‐soil strip systeme3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 88–119
e3

“The cumulative yield of fruit over 12 cropping years was much greater for trees growing in bare soil and for those receiving irrigation than for those growing in the narrow bare‐soil strip system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1020

Title

Effects of alley sward width, irrigation and nitrogen fertiliser on growth and yield of Cox's orange pippin apple trees

Neil A Hipps; Martin S Ridout; David Atkinson Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1990. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740530203

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-d04fe714dbef2ba44c0da313fff253997bb5feb596514818ef5089a16df95a0d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

84 papers: 63 positive, 21 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.