Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increasing fertiliser rate from 63 to 189 kg N ha −1 had negligible or inconsistent effects on tree growth, fruit yield and size

A claim from Effects of alley sward width, irrigation and nitrogen fertiliser on growth and yield of Cox's orange pippin apple trees · 1990

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing fertiliser rate from 63 to 189 kg N ha −1 had negligible or inconsistent effects on tree growth, fruit yield and size

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
Increasing fertiliser application rate from 63 to 189 kg N ha −1e2
Outcome
tree growth, fruit yield and sizee2
Direction
negligiblee2
Comparator
from 63e2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cox's Orange Pippin apple trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 88–119
e2

“Increasing fertiliser application rate from 63 to 189 kg N ha −1 had either negligible or inconsistent effects on tree growth, fruit yield and size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–823

Title

Effects of alley sward width, irrigation and nitrogen fertiliser on growth and yield of Cox's orange pippin apple trees

Neil A Hipps; Martin S Ridout; David Atkinson Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1990. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740530203

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-2d9b50a896b4dfde12f453d983574a6294ab02833720e41870cbccc84de6d6dc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

69 papers: 52 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 52 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

60 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

fertilization · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

178 papers: 150 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 150 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

169 papers more in this group

See all 178 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.