Claim · model-written summary
Chicken manure decreased Meloidogyne incognita numbers.
- Treatment
- CMe1
- Interactor
- M. incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Outcome
- decreased numbers of M. incognitae0
- Direction
- decreasede0
VitisNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“This was evident from the decreased numbers of M. incognita and increased numbers of FLNs and PNs in grapevine fields.”
e1“Among all tested manures, CM was the best treatment as a nematicide.”
t0“grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars”
Title
Osama M. M. Khder; Ramadan M. El-Ashry; Ahmed M. A. El-Deeb; et al. European Journal of Plant Pathology 2025. doi:10.1007/s10658-024-02999-7
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Flame had 79.9% more number of leaves/vines than untreated vines.
- Intervention effect Flame had 76.9% more total fruit weight/vine than untreated vines.
- Intervention effect Superior had 78.8% more number of leaves/vines than untreated vines.
- Intervention effect Superior had 75.0% more total fruit weight/vine than untreated vines.
- Intervention effect Prime had 73.1% more number of leaves/vines than untreated vines.
- Intervention effect Prime had 73.0% more total fruit weight/vine than untreated vines.
- Association With manure, free-living and predaceous nematodes were more abundant in Prime than Flame or Superior.
- Intervention effect Chicken manure increased free-living and predaceous nematode numbers.
- Intervention effect Chicken manure suppressed phytonematode population density for five months.
- Intervention effect Chicken manure improved soil structure and soil biological activities.
- Intervention effect Chicken manure plus PGPR gave the lowest Meloidogyne incognita count across cultivars.