Paper · 2021 · Egyptian Journal of Agronematology

Application of Animal Manure and Plant Growth- Promoting Rhizobacteria as Effective Tools to Control Soil Nematode Population and Increase Crop Yield in Grapevine Orchards

Ramadan El-Ashry

13
claims
22
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A survey of nematode community in grapevine plantations grown in Belbes, Sharqia, Egypt revealed the presence of nine plant-parasitic nematodes genera namely Aphelenchus, Criconemoides, Ditylenchus, Helicotylenchus, Pratylenchus, Meloidogyne, Longidorus, Tylenchus and Tylenchorhynchus; free-living nematodes (FLNs) belonging to the genus Rhabditis and predacious nematodes (PNs) belonging to order Mononchida. Nematodes were found with a different frequency of occurrence and population density. Pratylenchus gained a high population density (PD) followed by Tylenchus, Meloidogyne and Helicotylenchus. A higher prominence value (PV) was found with genus Pratylenchus (190.75) while, the genera Meloidogyne, Tylenchorhynchus and Tylenchus were found with moderate prominence values. Animal manures are effective tools in sustainable soil health and agricultural systems. Therefore, the influence of three livestock manures as feasible practices with BECTO Grow Roots®, a commercial plant growth-promoting bacterium (PGPB) on nematode community and plant growth and fruit yield of grapes, Vitis vinifera L. cv. Flame was undertaken. Soil samples were collected at five-time intervals. Composted animal manures significantly (P ≤ 0.05) minified numbers of plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs). The greatest effect was recorded with oxamyl after two months of treatments followed by chicken, sheep and cow manure. Conversely, at four and five months after application, animal manures were the most effective. Moreover, a noticeable abundance of FLNs and PNs numbers was detected. The highest increment was achieved in soil amended with chicken manure followed by sheep and cow manure whereas oxamyl reduced numbers of FLNs and PNs as compared with untreated vines. Application of manures against PPNs particularly M.incognita decreased numbers of J2/250/soil in vines amended with chicken, cow and sheep manure, respectively and increased numbers of FLNs and PNs. Population densities of M.incognita J2/250 g soil were significantly minimized (1.55 J2/250 g soil) in blocks amended with commercial rhizobacteria and chicken manure. Maximum total fruit weight and leaf numbers were achieved in vines treated with rhizobacteria +chicken, cow and sheep manure, respectively. This study proved that composted chicken, cow and sheep manure applied alone or in combination with PGPB can be a promising tool for the management of phytoparasitic nematodes, enrichment of FLNs and PNs and improvement of plant growth and grapevine yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nine plant-parasitic nematode genera and free-living and predacious nematodes occurred in grapevine plantations.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Interactor
plant-parasitic nematodese0pest
Outcome
presence of nine plant-parasitic nematodes generae0
Value
ninee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“presence of nine plant-parasitic nematodes genera namely Aphelenchus, Criconemoides, Ditylenchus, Helicotylenchus, Pratylenchus, Meloidogyne, Longidorus, Tylenchus and Tylenchorhynchus; free-living nematodes (FLNs) belonging to the genus Rhabditis and predacious nematodes (PNs) belonging to order Mononchida”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–409 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pratylenchus had the highest population density, followed by Tylenchus, Meloidogyne and Helicotylenchus.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Interactor
PratylenchusPratylenchuse0pest
Outcome
Pratylenchus gained a high population densitye0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus
Pratylenchus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pratylenchus gained a high population density (PD) followed by Tylenchus, Meloidogyne and Helicotylenchus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pratylenchus had a prominence value of 190.75.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Interactor
PratylenchusPratylenchuse0pest
Outcome
prominence value (PV)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
190.75e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pratylenchus
Pratylenchus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A higher prominence value (PV) was found with genus Pratylenchus (190.75)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–162 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Meloidogyne, Tylenchorhynchus and Tylenchus had moderate prominence values.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Interactor
MeloidogyneMeloidogynee0pest
Outcome
moderate prominence valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the genera Meloidogyne, Tylenchorhynchus and Tylenchus were found with moderate prominence values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Composted manures significantly reduced plant-parasitic nematode numbers.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Treatment
Composted animal manurese0
Interactor
plant-parasitic nematodese0pest
Outcome
numbers of plant-parasitic nematodese0
Direction
minifiede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Composted animal manures significantly (P ≤ 0.05) minified numbers of plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxamyl had the greatest effect after two months.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Treatment
oxamyle0
Outcome
greatest effecte0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
after two monthse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greatest effect was recorded with oxamyl after two months of treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manures were most effective at four and five months.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Treatment
animal manurese0
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0
Qualifier
four and five monthse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at four and five months after application, animal manures were the most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1501 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure produced the highest increase in free-living and predacious nematodes.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Treatment
chicken manuree0
Outcome
incremente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest increment was achieved in soil amended with chicken manure followed by sheep and cow manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxamyl reduced free-living and predacious nematodes relative to untreated vines.

Taxon
vinese0
Treatment
oxamyle0
Outcome
numbers of FLNs and PNse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated vinese0

Verbatim

e0

“oxamyl reduced numbers of FLNs and PNs as compared with untreated vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1686–1757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manures decreased Meloidogyne incognita juvenile numbers and increased free-living and predacious nematodes.

Taxon
vinese0
Treatment
manurese0
Interactor
M.incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
M.incognita decreased numbers of J2/250/soile0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of manures against PPNs particularly M.incognita decreased numbers of J2/250/soil in vines amended with chicken, cow and sheep manure, respectively and increased numbers of FLNs and PNs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacteria with chicken manure reduced M. incognita juveniles to 1.55 per 250 g soil.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Treatment
commercial rhizobacteria and chicken manuree0
Interactor
M.incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Second interactor
commercial rhizobacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
M.incognita J2/250 g soile0
Direction
minimizede0
Value
1.55 J2/250 g soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Population densities of M.incognita J2/250 g soil were significantly minimized (1.55 J2/250 g soil) in blocks amended with commercial rhizobacteria and chicken manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1958–2124 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacteria and chicken manure yielded maximum total fruit weight.

Taxon
vinese0
Treatment
rhizobacteria +chickene0
Interactor
rhizobacteriaHyphomicrobialese0symbiont
Outcome
total fruit weighte0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum total fruit weight and leaf numbers were achieved in vines treated with rhizobacteria +chicken, cow and sheep manure, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2126–2264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacteria and cow manure yielded maximum leaf numbers.

Taxon
vinese0
Treatment
cowe0
Outcome
leaf numberse0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum total fruit weight and leaf numbers were achieved in vines treated with rhizobacteria +chicken, cow and sheep manure, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2126–2264 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Meloidogyne incognita · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · Meloidogyne incognita · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.