Intervention effectmodel-written summary

PGPR inoculations increased macro and micro nutrient content of cauliflower transplants.

A claim from EFFECT OF PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA ON GROWTH, NUTRIENT, ORGANIC ACID, AMINO ACID AND HORMONE CONTENT OF CAULIFLOWER (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) TRANSPLANTS · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR inoculations increased macro and micro nutrient content of cauliflower transplants.

Treatment
PGPR inoculationse0
Outcome
macro and micro nutrient contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPR inoculations increased the macro and micro nutrient content of cauliflower transplants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1185

Title

EFFECT OF PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA ON GROWTH, NUTRIENT, ORGANIC ACID, AMINO ACID AND HORMONE CONTENT OF CAULIFLOWER (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis) TRANSPLANTS

Melek Ekinci; Metin Turan; Ertan Yıldırım; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2014

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-d0f9fcaf320a2d4ecf8cc2eb599301b0407eed5aae830936fa185f027c7bd538 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

inoculation · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.