Intervention effectmodel-written summary

BA and NAA supported profuse callus formation from Fuji apple cotyledons.

A claim from Effects of BA, TDZ, and CPPU on Formation of Adventitious Shoots from Callus Derived from Apple Cotyledon · 1994

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA and NAA supported profuse callus formation from Fuji apple cotyledons.

Material
'Fuji'e1
Organ / stage
Cotyledonse0
Treatment
0 to 4.0 mg•liter-1 BA and 0.5 to 10.0 mg•liter-1 NAAe0
Outcome
calluse0
Direction
profuselye0

Not reportedGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95
e0

“Cotyledons produced callus profusely when cultured on a medium supplemented with 0 to 4.0 mg•liter-1 BA and 0.5 to 10.0 mg•liter-1 NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–409
e1

“'Fuji' apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–46

Title

Effects of BA, TDZ, and CPPU on Formation of Adventitious Shoots from Callus Derived from Apple Cotyledon

Ming-guang Liu; Isao Ogiwara; Naotoshi Hakoda; et al. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 1994. doi:10.2503/jjshs.63.505

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-d1e80ed3527f4aba9b9c5ff30e4b6baf3b3b7e8e93378cda917364c1d04e242e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

43 papers: 31 positive, 12 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

N-benzyladenine · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

57 papers: 40 positive, 17 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.