Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Furrow irrigated raised beds significantly increased mean wheat grain yield over other plots.

A claim from Enhancing Yield and Water Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Through Sowing Methods and Irrigation Schedules under Light Textured Soil of Western Uttar Pradesh, India · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Furrow irrigated raised beds significantly increased mean wheat grain yield over other plots.

Treatment
furrow irrigated raised bedse0
Outcome
mean grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
rest of the plotse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“furrow irrigated raised beds increased the mean grain yield of wheat significantly over rest of the plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1105

Title

Enhancing Yield and Water Productivity of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Through Sowing Methods and Irrigation Schedules under Light Textured Soil of Western Uttar Pradesh, India

Vikrant Singh R.K. Naresh; Ravindra Kumar Adesh Singh; U. P. Shahi Vivak Kumar; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2017. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.604.171

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-d235b04727b20f410aa547df03e6216a1043cd82058558429691b8ecf9053040 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

1,405 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.