Intervention effectmodel-written summary

BA 140 ppm + NAA 4.29 ppm was most effective for apple 'Prima' regarding fruit weight, large-fruit number and fruit number per trunk cross-sectional area.

A claim from Application of NAA and BA in chemical thinning of some commercial apple cultivars · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA 140 ppm + NAA 4.29 ppm was most effective for apple 'Prima' regarding fruit weight, large-fruit number and fruit number per trunk cross-sectional area.

Material
Primae0
Treatment
BA 140 ppm + NAA 4.29 ppme0
Outcome
average fruit weight, number of fruits categorized as large (> 75 mm or > 65 mm), and number of fruit per trunk cross-sectional areae1
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–81
e0

“the treatment BA 140 ppm + NAA 4.29 ppm was most effective on 'McIntosh' and 'Prima'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–833
e1

“In terms of the average fruit weight, number of fruits categorized as large (> 75 mm or > 65 mm), and number of fruit per trunk cross-sectional area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–747

Title

Application of NAA and BA in chemical thinning of some commercial apple cultivars

Gordana Sebek Acta agriculturae Serbica 2015. doi:10.5937/aaser1539003s

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-d2e171c08deea0efedc490277a141502e05e09e5643987f6af8bc09f10cffcd6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

65 papers: 50 positive, 15 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

56 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

N-benzyladenine · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

75 papers: 57 positive, 18 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.