Paper · 1997 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Preliminary examination of thinning strategies on young ‘Jonagold’ and ‘Pink Lady’ apples

K. M. Jones; S. A. Bound; C. R. Summers; et al.

16
claims
41
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary. Strategies were examined for thinning 5-year-old apple trees of ‘Jonagold’ and ‘Pink Lady’ with chemical thinners. Both cultivars were left unthinned (control), hand-thinned at 20 days after full bloom (DAFB) or chemically thinned. The chemical treatments consisted of full bloom (FB) sprays of naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) at 2.5, 5 or 10 mg/L or ethephon at 25, 50 or 100 mg/L or combination treatments of 2.5, 5 or 10 mg NAA/L at FB followed by 50 mg ethephon/L at 7 DAFB. In addition 5 mg NAA/L or 50 mg ethephon/L were followed by 150 mg CyLex/L (6-benzyladenine, Abbott Laboratories) at 20 DAFB. Neither NAA, ethephon alone or NAA followed by ethephon were effective at the 2 lower concentrations. The highest level of NAA with ethephon did some thinning of ‘Pink Lady’ but overthinned ‘Jonagold’. The CyLex combination treatments were the most effective. Combining NAA and CyLex did not thin enough to increase fruit size in ‘Pink Lady’ and slightly overthinned ‘Jonagold’. The most effective treatment of ethephon and CyLex removed about half the crop load compared with the control for both cultivars. This resulted in a 29% increase in fruit weight and a 48% increase in fruit size for ‘Jonagold’. ‘Pink Lady’ increases were less, being 16% for fruit weight and 38% for fruit size. All mean fruit weight and size outcomes for the ethephon–CyLex treatment exceeded provisional targets. The ethephon–CyLex combination had important fruit quality outcomes other than fruit weight and size. Fruit soluble solids were increased by this treatment by 10% for ‘Jonagold’ and 6% for ‘Pink Lady’ and fruit firmness by 11% for ‘Jonagold’ and 5% for ‘Pink Lady’. The overall results for the ethephon–CyLex combination were most encouraging for both cultivars. Further work is required to substantiate these results.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA, ethephon, and sequential NAA plus ethephon at the two lower concentrations were ineffective thinners.

Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
effectivee0
Direction
Neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither NAA, ethephon alone or NAA followed by ethephon were effective at the 2 lower concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–712 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest dose NAA plus ethephon produced some thinning in Pink Lady.

Material
‘Pink Lady’e0
Treatment
highest level of NAA with ethephone0
Outcome
thinninge0
Direction
did some thinninge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest level of NAA with ethephon did some thinning of ‘Pink Lady’ but overthinned ‘Jonagold’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest dose NAA plus ethephon overthinned Jonagold.

Material
‘Jonagold’e0
Treatment
highest level of NAA with ethephone0
Outcome
overthinnede0
Direction
overthinnede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest level of NAA with ethephon did some thinning of ‘Pink Lady’ but overthinned ‘Jonagold’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CyLex combination treatments were most effective at thinning.

Treatment
CyLex combination treatmentse0
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CyLex combination treatments were the most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA plus CyLex did not thin Pink Lady enough to increase fruit size.

Material
‘Pink Lady’e0
Treatment
Combining NAA and CyLexe0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
did not thin enough to increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combining NAA and CyLex did not thin enough to increase fruit size in ‘Pink Lady’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–953 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA plus CyLex slightly overthinned Jonagold.

Material
‘Jonagold’e0
Treatment
NAA and CyLexe1
Outcome
overthinnede0
Direction
overthinnede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“slightly overthinned ‘Jonagold’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–989 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combining NAA and CyLex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon plus CyLex halved crop load in both cultivars relative to control.

Treatment
ethephon and CyLexe0
Outcome
crop loade0
Direction
removede0
Value
about halfe0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most effective treatment of ethephon and CyLex removed about half the crop load compared with the control for both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon plus CyLex increased Jonagold fruit weight by 29%.

Material
‘Jonagold’e0
Treatment
ethephon and CyLexe1
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This resulted in a 29% increase in fruit weight and a 48% increase in fruit size for ‘Jonagold’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“The most effective treatment of ethephon and CyLex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon plus CyLex increased Jonagold fruit size by 48%.

Material
‘Jonagold’e0
Treatment
ethephon and CyLexe1
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
48%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This resulted in a 29% increase in fruit weight and a 48% increase in fruit size for ‘Jonagold’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“The most effective treatment of ethephon and CyLex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pink Lady fruit weight increased by 16%.

Material
‘Pink Lady’e0
Treatment
ethephon and CyLexe1
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
increasese0
Value
16%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Pink Lady’ increases were less, being 16% for fruit weight and 38% for fruit size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“The most effective treatment of ethephon and CyLex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pink Lady fruit size increased by 38%.

Material
‘Pink Lady’e0
Treatment
ethephon and CyLexe1
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
increasese0
Value
38%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Pink Lady’ increases were less, being 16% for fruit weight and 38% for fruit size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“The most effective treatment of ethephon and CyLex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean fruit weight and size under ethephon–CyLex exceeded provisional targets.

Treatment
ethephon–CyLex treatmente0
Outcome
mean fruit weight and size outcomese0
Direction
exceedede0
Comparator
provisional targetse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All mean fruit weight and size outcomes for the ethephon–CyLex treatment exceeded provisional targets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1403 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon–CyLex increased Jonagold fruit soluble solids by 10%.

Material
‘Jonagold’e0
Treatment
ethephon–CyLexe1
Outcome
Fruit soluble solidse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit soluble solids were increased by this treatment by 10% for ‘Jonagold’ and 6% for ‘Pink Lady’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1605 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“The ethephon–CyLex combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon–CyLex increased Pink Lady fruit soluble solids by 6%.

Material
‘Pink Lady’e0
Treatment
ethephon–CyLexe1
Outcome
Fruit soluble solidse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit soluble solids were increased by this treatment by 10% for ‘Jonagold’ and 6% for ‘Pink Lady’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1605 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“The ethephon–CyLex combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon–CyLex increased Jonagold fruit firmness by 11%.

Material
‘Jonagold’e0
Treatment
ethephon–CyLexe1
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Value
11%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit firmness by 11% for ‘Jonagold’ and 5% for ‘Pink Lady’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1669 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“The ethephon–CyLex combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon–CyLex increased Pink Lady fruit firmness by 5%.

Material
‘Pink Lady’e0
Treatment
ethephon–CyLexe1
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Value
5%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit firmness by 11% for ‘Jonagold’ and 5% for ‘Pink Lady’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1669 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“The ethephon–CyLex combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1435 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

32 papers: 26 positive, 6 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

65 papers: 50 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

73 papers: 44 positive, 29 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.