Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ethrel at 300 mg·L-1 did not affect russet or starch degradation pattern of Buckeye Gala apple at harvest.

A claim from Impacts of 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylic Acid as a Late Post-Bloom Thinner on Fruit Set, Yield, and Fruit Quality in “Gala” and “Fuji” Apples · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel at 300 mg·L-1 did not affect russet or starch degradation pattern of Buckeye Gala apple at harvest.

Taxon
Malus domestica Borkh.Malus domesticae1
Material
Buckeye Galae2
Treatment
Ethrel at 300 mg·L-1e3
Outcome
russet, and starch degradation pattern (SDP)e3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Qualifier
at harveste3

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–74
e2

“one rate of Ethrel in “Buckeye Gala” apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–452
e3

“application of Ethrel at 300 mg·L-1 did not affect fruit set, fruit weight, diameter (D), length(L), or L/D ratio 34 days after application, or yield, fruit weight, color, russet, and starch degradation pattern (SDP) at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–866

Title

Impacts of 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylic Acid as a Late Post-Bloom Thinner on Fruit Set, Yield, and Fruit Quality in “Gala” and “Fuji” Apples

Esmaeil Fallahi; Steven J. McArtney American Journal of Plant Sciences 2022. doi:10.4236/ajps.2022.134031

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-0a26095a18be2ccd3d7a53fdf39a82884bc167a71241c70e75cea9931ca2af47 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.