Paper · 2022 · American Journal of Plant Sciences

Impacts of 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylic Acid as a Late Post-Bloom Thinner on Fruit Set, Yield, and Fruit Quality in “Gala” and “Fuji” Apples

Esmaeil Fallahi; Steven J. McArtney

15
claims
36
verbatim quotes
7
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A few post-bloom thinners are available for apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) and the prospects for additional thinners appear to be limited. Application of blossom thinners may present a risk of overthining in the areas where weather is less predictable. Thus, we studied the impacts of various rates of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) in three strains of “Fuji” apple and different rates of ACC and one rate of Ethrel in “Buckeye Gala” apple, when fruitlet diameter was about 20 mm, on fruit set, yield and fruit quality attributes at harvest, and return bloom in southwest Idaho in the Intermountain West region, USA. In 2013, application of Ethrel at 300 mg·L-1 did not affect fruit set, fruit weight, diameter (D), length(L), or L/D ratio 34 days after application, or yield, fruit weight, color, russet, and starch degradation pattern (SDP) at harvest, while application of ACC at 150 mg·L-1 or higher reduced fruit set by 19% to 34% in “Buckeye Gala” apple. In this cultivar, application of ACC at 350 mg·L-1 significantly increased fruit weight, diameter and length 34 days after application, and increased fruit weight, color, and SDP at harvest time. Application of ACC at all rates reduced total yield per tree in “Buckeye Gala”. Application of ACC at 300 mg·L-1 significantly reduced fruit set but applications of 150 mg·L-1 or 300 mg·L-1 ACC did not affect yield or quality attributes of “Sun Fuji” apple in Sunny Slope area in 2013. Application of ACC reduced fruit set and slightly increased fruit size in “Top Export Fuji” in 2013. Application of ACC at 600 mg·L-1 significantly reduced fruit set in “Aztec Fuji” apple in 2014. Application of ACC in a season never reduced bloom density (return bloom) of the next season. Overall, we conclude that ACC is an excellent tool as a late-season post-bloom fruit thinner and can be effective when applied fruitlet diameter is about 20 mm.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel at 300 mg·L-1 did not affect fruit set, fruit weight or diameter of Buckeye Gala apple 34 days after application.

Taxon
Malus domestica Borkh.Malus domesticae1
Material
Buckeye Galae2
Treatment
Ethrel at 300 mg·L-1e3
Outcome
fruit set, fruit weight, diameter (D)e3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Qualifier
34 days after applicatione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e2

“one rate of Ethrel in “Buckeye Gala” apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–452 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of Ethrel at 300 mg·L-1 did not affect fruit set, fruit weight, diameter (D), length(L), or L/D ratio 34 days after application, or yield, fruit weight, color, russet, and starch degradation pattern (SDP) at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel at 300 mg·L-1 did not affect fruit length or L/D ratio of Buckeye Gala apple 34 days after application.

Taxon
Malus domestica Borkh.Malus domesticae1
Material
Buckeye Galae2
Treatment
Ethrel at 300 mg·L-1e3
Outcome
length(L), or L/D ratioe3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Qualifier
34 days after applicatione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e2

“one rate of Ethrel in “Buckeye Gala” apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–452 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of Ethrel at 300 mg·L-1 did not affect fruit set, fruit weight, diameter (D), length(L), or L/D ratio 34 days after application, or yield, fruit weight, color, russet, and starch degradation pattern (SDP) at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel at 300 mg·L-1 did not affect yield, fruit weight or color of Buckeye Gala apple at harvest.

Taxon
Malus domestica Borkh.Malus domesticae1
Material
Buckeye Galae2
Treatment
Ethrel at 300 mg·L-1e3
Outcome
yield, fruit weight, colore3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Qualifier
at harveste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e2

“one rate of Ethrel in “Buckeye Gala” apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–452 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of Ethrel at 300 mg·L-1 did not affect fruit set, fruit weight, diameter (D), length(L), or L/D ratio 34 days after application, or yield, fruit weight, color, russet, and starch degradation pattern (SDP) at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel at 300 mg·L-1 did not affect russet or starch degradation pattern of Buckeye Gala apple at harvest.

Taxon
Malus domestica Borkh.Malus domesticae1
Material
Buckeye Galae2
Treatment
Ethrel at 300 mg·L-1e3
Outcome
russet, and starch degradation pattern (SDP)e3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Qualifier
at harveste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e2

“one rate of Ethrel in “Buckeye Gala” apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–452 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of Ethrel at 300 mg·L-1 did not affect fruit set, fruit weight, diameter (D), length(L), or L/D ratio 34 days after application, or yield, fruit weight, color, russet, and starch degradation pattern (SDP) at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC at 150 mg·L-1 or higher reduced fruit set of Buckeye Gala apple by 19% to 34%.

Taxon
Malus domestica Borkh.Malus domesticae1
Material
Buckeye Galae4
Treatment
ACC at 150 mg·L-1 or highere4
Outcome
fruit sete4
Direction
reducede4
Value
19% to 34%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e4

“application of ACC at 150 mg·L-1 or higher reduced fruit set by 19% to 34% in “Buckeye Gala” apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC at 350 mg·L-1 significantly increased fruit weight, diameter and length of Buckeye Gala apple 34 days after application.

Taxon
Malus domestica Borkh.Malus domesticae1
Material
Buckeye Galae2
Treatment
ACC at 350 mg·L-1e5
Outcome
fruit weight, diameter and lengthe5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
34 days after applicatione5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e2

“one rate of Ethrel in “Buckeye Gala” apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–452 · show in text ↑
e5

“In this cultivar, application of ACC at 350 mg·L-1 significantly increased fruit weight, diameter and length 34 days after application, and increased fruit weight, color, and SDP at harvest time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC at 350 mg·L-1 increased fruit weight, color and starch degradation pattern of Buckeye Gala apple at harvest.

Taxon
Malus domestica Borkh.Malus domesticae1
Material
Buckeye Galae2
Treatment
ACC at 350 mg·L-1e5
Outcome
fruit weight, color, and SDPe5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
at harvest timee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e2

“one rate of Ethrel in “Buckeye Gala” apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–452 · show in text ↑
e5

“In this cultivar, application of ACC at 350 mg·L-1 significantly increased fruit weight, diameter and length 34 days after application, and increased fruit weight, color, and SDP at harvest time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC at all rates reduced total yield per tree of Buckeye Gala apple.

Taxon
Malus domestica Borkh.Malus domesticae1
Material
Buckeye Galae6
Treatment
ACC at all ratese6
Outcome
total yield per treee6
Direction
reducede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e6

“Application of ACC at all rates reduced total yield per tree in “Buckeye Gala””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC at 300 mg·L-1 significantly reduced fruit set of Sun Fuji apple in Sunny Slope area in 2013.

Taxon
Malus domestica Borkh.Malus domesticae1
Material
Sun Fujie7
Treatment
ACC at 300 mg·L-1e7
Outcome
fruit sete7
Direction
reducede7
Setting
Sunny Slope areae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e7

“Application of ACC at 300 mg·L-1 significantly reduced fruit set but applications of 150 mg·L-1 or 300 mg·L-1 ACC did not affect yield or quality attributes of “Sun Fuji” apple in Sunny Slope area in 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC at 150 or 300 mg·L-1 did not affect yield or quality attributes of Sun Fuji apple in Sunny Slope area.

Taxon
Malus domestica Borkh.Malus domesticae1
Material
Sun Fujie7
Treatment
applications of 150 mg·L-1 or 300 mg·L-1 ACCe7
Outcome
yield or quality attributese7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7
Setting
Sunny Slope areae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e7

“Application of ACC at 300 mg·L-1 significantly reduced fruit set but applications of 150 mg·L-1 or 300 mg·L-1 ACC did not affect yield or quality attributes of “Sun Fuji” apple in Sunny Slope area in 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC reduced fruit set of Top Export Fuji apple in 2013.

Taxon
Malus domestica Borkh.Malus domesticae1
Material
Top Export Fujie0
Treatment
Application of ACCe0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in 2013e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of ACC reduced fruit set and slightly increased fruit size in “Top Export Fuji” in 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC slightly increased fruit size of Top Export Fuji apple in 2013.

Taxon
Malus domestica Borkh.Malus domesticae1
Material
Top Export Fujie0
Treatment
Application of ACCe0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
slightlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of ACC reduced fruit set and slightly increased fruit size in “Top Export Fuji” in 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC at 600 mg·L-1 significantly reduced fruit set of Aztec Fuji apple in 2014.

Taxon
Malus domestica Borkh.Malus domesticae1
Material
Aztec Fujie0
Treatment
ACC at 600 mg·L-1e0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in 2014e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of ACC at 600 mg·L-1 significantly reduced fruit set in “Aztec Fuji” apple in 2014”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1651 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC applied in a season did not reduce bloom density (return bloom) of the next season.

Taxon
Malus domestica Borkh.Malus domesticae1
Treatment
Application of ACCe0
Outcome
bloom density (return bloom)e0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Qualifier
of the next seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of ACC in a season never reduced bloom density (return bloom) of the next season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1653–1745 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that ACC is an excellent late-season post-bloom fruit thinner for apple when applied at about 20 mm fruitlet diameter.

Taxon
Malus domestica Borkh.Malus domesticae1
Treatment
ACCe0
Outcome
late-season post-bloom fruit thinnere0
Qualifier
when applied fruitlet diameter is about 20 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–74 · show in text ↑
e0

“we conclude that ACC is an excellent tool as a late-season post-bloom fruit thinner and can be effective when applied fruitlet diameter is about 20 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–1906 · show in text ↑

1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

32 papers: 26 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

73 papers: 44 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acid · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.