Intervention effectmodel-written summary

One AVG plus two NAA applications gave less Golden Supreme fruit drop than one or two AVG applications.

A claim from Effects of NAA, AVG, and 1-MCP on Ethylene Biosynthesis, Preharvest Fruit Drop, Fruit Maturity, and Quality of ‘Golden Supreme’ and ‘Golden Delicious’ Apples · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One AVG plus two NAA applications gave less Golden Supreme fruit drop than one or two AVG applications.

Material
‘Golden Supreme’e1
Treatment
the combination of one application of AVG and two applications of NAAe0
Outcome
preharvest fruit drope0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
one or two applications of AVGe0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with one or two applications of AVG, the combination of one application of AVG and two applications of NAA had much lower preharvest fruit drop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–722
e1

“In ‘Golden Supreme’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–337

Title

Effects of NAA, AVG, and 1-MCP on Ethylene Biosynthesis, Preharvest Fruit Drop, Fruit Maturity, and Quality of ‘Golden Supreme’ and ‘Golden Delicious’ Apples

Rongcai Yuan; David H. Carbaugh HortScience 2007. doi:10.21273/hortsci.42.1.101

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-06dfbfc57d491dc2313c0c6515e708bb15afe21267ce7828d15e860b54d77229 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

65 papers: 50 positive, 15 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.