Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At one week before harvest, 1-MCP delayed Golden Delicious drop more than NAA.

A claim from Effects of NAA, AVG, and 1-MCP on Ethylene Biosynthesis, Preharvest Fruit Drop, Fruit Maturity, and Quality of ‘Golden Supreme’ and ‘Golden Delicious’ Apples · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At one week before harvest, 1-MCP delayed Golden Delicious drop more than NAA.

Material
‘Golden Delicious’e0
Treatment
1-MCP at 396 mg·L −1e0
Outcome
fruit drope0
Direction
better effect in delayinge0
Comparator
NAA at 20 mg·L −1e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In ‘Golden Delicious’ apples, 1-MCP at 396 mg·L −1 had a better effect in delaying fruit drop than did AVG at 125 mg·L −1 or NAA at 20 mg·L −1 when they were applied a week before the optimum harvest date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1027

Title

Effects of NAA, AVG, and 1-MCP on Ethylene Biosynthesis, Preharvest Fruit Drop, Fruit Maturity, and Quality of ‘Golden Supreme’ and ‘Golden Delicious’ Apples

Rongcai Yuan; David H. Carbaugh HortScience 2007. doi:10.21273/hortsci.42.1.101

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-40f1084fbfb14ed560393860e527de141bbed1c449a07b130cce50b6fecfc9fb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

1-methylcyclopropene · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.