Paper · 2007 · HortScience

Preharvest Applications of Sprayable 1-methylcyclopropene in the Orchard for Management of Apple Harvest and Postharvest Condition

Don C. Elfving; Stephen R. Drake; A. Nathan Reed; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
80
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A sprayable formulation of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP; AgroFresh, Spring House, PA) was applied to ‘Scarletspur Delicious’ and ‘Cameo’ apples in the orchard 1 to 3 weeks before harvest and compared in different postharvest studies with the commercial postharvest 1-MCP fruit treatment (SmartFresh; AgroFresh) and with aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG; ReTain; Valent BioSciences, Walnut Creek, CA). Treated apples were held in air storage for 50 to 60 d or in controlled-atmosphere storage for 120 to 125 or 215 to 225 d. With increased concentration, sprayable 1-MCP treatments were effective at controlling flesh firmness loss and internal ethylene concentration (IEC) up to 225 d of storage as well as during a 7-d poststorage shelf life simulation at room temperature. Application closer to harvest improved the effect of sprayable 1-MCP on control of flesh firmness loss and IEC. Concentrations of sprayable 1-MCP above 90 mg a.i./L produced similar fruit effects to 1-MCP. Treatment with 1-MCP showed little effect on soluble solids concentration (SSC), titratable acidity (TA), or skin or flesh color in ‘Delicious’ but slightly increased SSC and TA in ‘Cameo’ apples. AVG applied 4 weeks before commercial harvest controlled IEC nearly as well as either sprayable 1-MCP or 1-MCP during storage, but AVG-treated fruit allowed to ripen for 7 d at room temperature after storage lost much more flesh firmness regardless of storage regime. Sprayable 1-MCP also reduced starch hydrolysis, IEC and fruit drop at harvest. Sprayable 1-MCP may offer new opportunities for effective preharvest management of apple fruit condition, storability, and poststorage fruit quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher sprayable 1-MCP concentrations controlled apple firmness loss through storage and shelf life.

Treatment
sprayable 1-MCP treatmentse0
Outcome
flesh firmness losse0
Direction
controllinge0
Qualifier
up to 225 d of storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increased concentration, sprayable 1-MCP treatments were effective at controlling flesh firmness loss and internal ethylene concentration (IEC) up to 225 d of storage as well as during a 7-d poststorage shelf life simulation at room temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Harvest and Postharvest Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher sprayable 1-MCP concentrations controlled internal ethylene concentration through storage and shelf life.

Treatment
sprayable 1-MCP treatmentse0
Outcome
internal ethylene concentration (IEC)e0
Direction
controllinge0
Qualifier
up to 225 d of storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increased concentration, sprayable 1-MCP treatments were effective at controlling flesh firmness loss and internal ethylene concentration (IEC) up to 225 d of storage as well as during a 7-d poststorage shelf life simulation at room temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Harvest and Postharvest Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying sprayable 1-MCP closer to harvest improved control of flesh firmness loss and IEC.

Treatment
Application closer to harveste0
Outcome
flesh firmness loss and IECe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application closer to harvest improved the effect of sprayable 1-MCP on control of flesh firmness loss and IEC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Harvest and Postharvest Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayable 1-MCP above 90 mg a.i./L had similar fruit effects to postharvest 1-MCP.

Treatment
sprayable 1-MCP above 90 mg a.i./Le0
Outcome
fruit effectse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
1-MCPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentrations of sprayable 1-MCP above 90 mg a.i./L produced similar fruit effects to 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Harvest and Postharvest Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Delicious apples, 1-MCP had little effect on soluble solids, acidity and skin or flesh color.

Material
‘Delicious’e0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
soluble solids concentration (SSC), titratable acidity (TA), or skin or flesh colore0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with 1-MCP showed little effect on soluble solids concentration (SSC), titratable acidity (TA), or skin or flesh color in ‘Delicious’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Harvest and Postharvest Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Cameo apples, 1-MCP slightly increased soluble solids and titratable acidity.

Material
‘Cameo’e0
Treatment
1-MCPe1
Outcome
SSC and TAe0
Direction
slightly increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“slightly increased SSC and TA in ‘Cameo’ apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Harvest and Postharvest Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“With increased concentration, sprayable 1-MCP treatments were effective at controlling flesh firmness loss and internal ethylene concentration (IEC) up to 225 d of storage as well as during a 7-d poststorage shelf life simulation at room temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest AVG controlled IEC almost as well as sprayable or postharvest 1-MCP.

Treatment
AVG applied 4 weeks before commercial harveste0
Outcome
IECe0
Direction
nearly as welle0
Comparator
sprayable 1-MCP or 1-MCPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AVG applied 4 weeks before commercial harvest controlled IEC nearly as well as either sprayable 1-MCP or 1-MCP during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Harvest and Postharvest Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AVG-treated apples lost substantially more firmness after seven days of ripening after storage.

Treatment
AVG-treated fruite0
Outcome
flesh firmnesse0
Direction
lost much moree0
Qualifier
7 d at room temperature after storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AVG-treated fruit allowed to ripen for 7 d at room temperature after storage lost much more flesh firmness regardless of storage regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1439 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Harvest and Postharvest Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayable 1-MCP reduced apple starch hydrolysis.

Treatment
Sprayable 1-MCPe0
Outcome
starch hydrolysise0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sprayable 1-MCP also reduced starch hydrolysis, IEC and fruit drop at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Harvest and Postharvest Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayable 1-MCP reduced apple IEC.

Treatment
Sprayable 1-MCPe0
Outcome
IECe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sprayable 1-MCP also reduced starch hydrolysis, IEC and fruit drop at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Harvest and Postharvest Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprayable 1-MCP reduced apple fruit drop at harvest.

Treatment
Sprayable 1-MCPe0
Outcome
fruit drop at harveste0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sprayable 1-MCP also reduced starch hydrolysis, IEC and fruit drop at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Harvest and Postharvest Condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–130 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose sprayable 1-MCP for preharvest management of apple condition and postharvest quality.

Outcome
preharvest management of apple fruit condition, storability, and poststorage fruit qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sprayable 1-MCP may offer new opportunities for effective preharvest management of apple fruit condition, storability, and poststorage fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1668 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

52 papers: 37 positive, 15 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

56 papers: 47 positive, 9 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

120 papers: 113 positive, 7 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 93 positive, 6 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

application · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 29 positive, 20 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 58 positive, 16 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.