Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Preharvest and postharvest 1-MCP reduced stored fruit ethylene concentration and firmness loss.

A claim from ‘Law Rome’ and ‘Golden Delicious’ Apples Differ in Their Response to Preharvest and Postharvest 1-Methylcyclopropene Treatment Combinations · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest and postharvest 1-MCP reduced stored fruit ethylene concentration and firmness loss.

Treatment
preharvest and postharvest 1-MCP treatmentse0
Outcome
Fruit internal ethylene concentration and firmness losse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
30- to 40-days storage at 0 °C plus 7 days at 20 °Ce0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit internal ethylene concentration and firmness loss after 30- to 40-days storage at 0 °C plus 7 days at 20 °C were reduced by preharvest and postharvest 1-MCP treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–536
t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–40

Title

‘Law Rome’ and ‘Golden Delicious’ Apples Differ in Their Response to Preharvest and Postharvest 1-Methylcyclopropene Treatment Combinations

Steven J. McArtney; John D. Obermiller; Tom Hoyt; et al. HortScience 2009. doi:10.21273/hortsci.44.6.1632

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-9cc415496dd2c2f79d6caf0540f7f2b4614a999687ae43faa20ac31281d3a90d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 93 positive, 6 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.