Paper · 2017 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

AVG, NAA, boron, and magnesium influence preharvest fruit drop and fruit quality of ‘Honeycrisp’ apples

Michelle H. Arseneault; John A. Cline

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Preharvest fruit drop (PFD) of apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) can cause significant losses resulting in up to 50% reduction in yield in some years. In a 2-yr study, ‘Honeycrisp’ trees were treated with six foliar treatments including 20 mg·L −1 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) 2 wk before anticipated harvest (WBAH), 125 mg·L −1 aminoethoxyvinylglycine hydrochloride (AVG) 4 WBAH, AVG plus NAA 2 WBAH, and repeat sprays of 200 mg·L −1 B, and 2000 mg·L −1 Mg applied 48–93 d after full bloom to evaluate their effect on PFD and fruit quality. Fruit drop associated with broken pedicels and physiological causes was monitored. During a year with ∼43% PFD on untreated control trees, AVG retained up to ∼35% and NAA retained up to ∼27% of the total fruit number, relative to the control trees. The combination of AVG plus NAA had similar PFD compared with AVG alone, while B and Mg were similar to the control. The proportion of PFD associated with broken pedicels was ∼5%. Aminoethoxyvinylglycine delayed starch degradation, ethylene evolution, and blush skin colour development of fruit. This study supports the use of AVG 4 WBAH and NAA 2 WBAH to manage ‘Honeycrisp’ PFD, which may offer economic advantages for growing quality apples. Foliar sprays of Mg or B failed to reduce PFD.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AVG retained up to about 35% of total fruit number relative to controls in a high-drop year.

Treatment
AVGe0
Outcome
total fruit numbere0
Direction
retainede0
Value
∼35%e0
Qualifier
∼43% PFDe0
Comparator
untreated control treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During a year with ∼43% PFD on untreated control trees, AVG retained up to ∼35% and NAA retained up to ∼27% of the total fruit number, relative to the control trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA retained up to about 27% of total fruit number relative to controls in a high-drop year.

Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
total fruit numbere0
Direction
retainede0
Value
∼27%e0
Qualifier
∼43% PFDe0
Comparator
untreated control treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During a year with ∼43% PFD on untreated control trees, AVG retained up to ∼35% and NAA retained up to ∼27% of the total fruit number, relative to the control trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined AVG and NAA had similar preharvest fruit drop to AVG alone.

Treatment
AVG plus NAAe0
Outcome
PFDe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
AVG alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of AVG plus NAA had similar PFD compared with AVG alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B treatment had preharvest fruit drop similar to controls.

Treatment
Be0
Outcome
PFDe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of AVG plus NAA had similar PFD compared with AVG alone, while B and Mg were similar to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mg treatment had preharvest fruit drop similar to controls.

Treatment
Mge0
Outcome
PFDe0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of AVG plus NAA had similar PFD compared with AVG alone, while B and Mg were similar to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 5% of fruit drop was associated with broken pedicels.

Organ / stage
pedicelse0
Outcome
proportion of PFD associated with broken pedicelse0
Value
∼5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proportion of PFD associated with broken pedicels was ∼5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AVG delayed starch degradation in fruit.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
Aminoethoxyvinylglycinee0
Outcome
starch degradatione0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aminoethoxyvinylglycine delayed starch degradation, ethylene evolution, and blush skin colour development of fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AVG delayed ethylene evolution in fruit.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
Aminoethoxyvinylglycinee0
Outcome
ethylene evolutione0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aminoethoxyvinylglycine delayed starch degradation, ethylene evolution, and blush skin colour development of fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AVG delayed blush skin colour development in fruit.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
Aminoethoxyvinylglycinee0
Outcome
blush skin colour developmente0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aminoethoxyvinylglycine delayed starch degradation, ethylene evolution, and blush skin colour development of fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors support AVG four weeks before harvest to manage Honeycrisp fruit drop.

Treatment
AVG 4 WBAHe0
Outcome
manage ‘Honeycrisp’ PFDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study supports the use of AVG 4 WBAH and NAA 2 WBAH to manage ‘Honeycrisp’ PFD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors support NAA two weeks before harvest to manage Honeycrisp fruit drop.

Treatment
NAA 2 WBAHe0
Outcome
manage ‘Honeycrisp’ PFDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study supports the use of AVG 4 WBAH and NAA 2 WBAH to manage ‘Honeycrisp’ PFD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

65 papers: 50 positive, 15 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

magnesium atom · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

boron atom · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.