Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pruning Regina cherries grafted on MaxMa 14 in the first decade of September positively affected fruit yield.

A claim from THE IMPACT OF THE PRUNING TIME ON THE BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF CHERRY VARIETIES GRAFTED ON MAXMA 14 · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning Regina cherries grafted on MaxMa 14 in the first decade of September positively affected fruit yield.

Taxon
sweet cherryPrunus aviume0
Material
Reginae0
Treatment
pruning done in the first decade of Septembere0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
positive effecte0
Qualifier
grafted on MaxMa 14e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus avium
Prunus avium · TaxonMPF · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The data on the yield of the Kordia and Regina sweet cherry varieties grafted on MaxMa 14 are promising and prove that the pruning done in the first decade of September has a positive effect on the fruit yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1136

Title

THE IMPACT OF THE PRUNING TIME ON THE BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF CHERRY VARIETIES GRAFTED ON MAXMA 14

Valerian Balan; Vasile Sarban Annals of the University of Craiova Series Biology Horticulture Food products processing technology Environmental engineering 2023. doi:10.52846/bihpt.v28i64.73

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-d447c4ab22c1dbce91cea8a223401939a394990392ad95bb4ab85b910c7524be · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

pruning · yield · Prunus avium (sweet cherry)Results differ

21 papers: 14 positive, 7 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Spurs isolated by girdling above and below had lower total fruit weight per spur and weight per fruit than spurs on one side of a girdle.

    Sources of Photosynthate for Fruit Growth in ‘Bing’ Sweet Cherry · 1987 · compared with those above or below girdles

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    No thinning agent reduced fruit set or yield in 2004.

    Physiological and Horticultural Effects of Sweet Cherry Chemical Blossom Thinners · 2006 · compared with untreated control

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Winter pruning reduced sweet cherry yield by 44%.

    Effect of Prebloom Pruning on 13C and 15N Distribution during Early Spring in Sweet Cherry · 2018 · compared with without pruning

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Control (unpruned) sweet cherry trees had a similar yield and yield efficiency as pruned trees.

    Effects of summer pruning on vegetative growth, fruit quality and carbohydrates of 'Regina' and 'Kordia' sweet cherry trees on 'Gisela 5' · 2008 · compared with Control trees

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Exclusive mechanical pruning reduced fruit size.

    Improving profitability: assessment of new rootstocks and planting systems · 2019

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Yield per tree in the third year after pruning was almost three times less than before pruning.

    Effect of Crown Restriction on the Growth and Productivity of Sweet Cherries · 2013 · compared with before pruning

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Virus infection reduced yield of sweet cherry trees through fewer generative spurs.

    Effect of infection by viruses on vegetative and reproductive growth of sweet cherry on Damil and Inmil rootstocks · 2002 · compared with virus free controls

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    In 2002, each thinning treatment nearly eliminated the yield of small sweet cherry fruit compared to the control.

    Chemical Blossom Thinners Vary in Their Effect on Sweet Cherry Fruit Set, Yield, Fruit Quality, and Crop Value · 2006 · compared with C

    Same direction

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.