Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 150 kg ha -1 rate with Pallas gave the highest seeds per spike at 76.48.

A claim from Weed Management and Productivity of Bread Wheat as Affected by Seed Rates and Herbicides Application at Holeta Ethiopia · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 kg ha -1 rate with Pallas gave the highest seeds per spike at 76.48.

Treatment
150 kg ha -1 seed rate with Pallas 45 ODe1
Outcome
seeds per spikee1
Direction
higheste1
Value
76.48e1
Comparator
weedy checke1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–374
e1

“highest number of productive tillers(133.33 m -2 ),seeds per spike(76.48), thousand grain weight (44.36 g),grain yield (4516.42 kg ha -1 )and biological yield(13100 kg ha -1 ) were recorded from the combination of 150 kg ha -1 seed rate with Pallas 45 OD while the lowest values were observed from the weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1586

Title

Weed Management and Productivity of Bread Wheat as Affected by Seed Rates and Herbicides Application at Holeta Ethiopia

Bogale Ayana Journal of Biology Agriculture and Healthcare 2020. doi:10.7176/jbah/10-9-04

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-d4c7c0022dc2f3f8b0a3fda1195b80cafa78c7c5c87594a1b7acdcddd9b02a48 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this claim · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

489 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.