Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combined seed and foliar treatment improved groundnut net returns.

A claim from Efficacy of Insecticides against Sucking Insect Pests in Groundnut · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined seed and foliar treatment improved groundnut net returns.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
seed treatment with imidacloprid 18.5% + hexaconazole 1.50% FS, along with foliar spray of acetamiprid 20% SPe1
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This approach led to superior pest management, resulting in higher pod yield, net returns, and a favourable benefit-cost ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–494
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–66
e1

“seed treatment with imidacloprid 18.5% + hexaconazole 1.50% FS, along with foliar spray of acetamiprid 20% SP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–335

Title

Efficacy of Insecticides against Sucking Insect Pests in Groundnut

Madhuri Burjikindi; Rohini Sugandi; Basavaraj S. Yenagi; et al. Indian Journal of Entomology 2024. doi:10.55446/ije.2024.1992

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-d9a6701a15ae31bf209d2a727c0d444b185b7d79b673d23d9a0b6ee5ccc0218f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

imidacloprid · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

acetamiprid · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

hexaconazole · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.