Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide sprays on Dimtu reduced yield loss by 69.13%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Dimtue1
Treatment
Insecticide sprayse1
Outcome
yield losse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
69.13%e1
Comparator
control plotse1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Helicoverpa armigera is a key polyphagous insect that causes significant qualitative and quantitative chickpea yield reductions worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–137
e1

“Insecticide sprays on Dimtu and Habru varieties reduced yield loss by 69.13% and 67.79% and increased yield advantage by 223.89% and 210.42%, respectively, over control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1433

Title

Combination of variety with cultural as well as chemical tactics reduce damage and yield loss caused by Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptere:Noctuidae), enhance agronomic performance and influence nodule formation in chickpeas

Zemenu Fentahun; Getachew Gudero Mengesha; Asnake Abera; et al. Journal of Scientific Agriculture 2025. doi:10.25081/jsa.2025.v9.9543

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-da321c4843ae2eb3baf0b066aa4a5b7715f5b450c3c3cd71189e10e5829299fd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

insecticide · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

177 papers: 173 positive, 4 negative or no effect

172 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

168 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.