Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Solarized soil with neem cake ranked after tomato alone for the shoot and root outcomes.

A claim from Comparative efficacy of unsolarized and solarized soil interacted with Neem cake and Carbendazim amendments effect on Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici of tomato · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Solarized soil with neem cake ranked after tomato alone for the shoot and root outcomes.

Treatment
T2 (solarized soil with neem cake )e0
Outcome
shoot and root length , fresh and dry shoot weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the shoot and root length , fresh and dry shoot weight significantly increased in treatment T6 (tomato plant alone) followed by T2 (solarized soil with neem cake ) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1228

Title

Comparative efficacy of unsolarized and solarized soil interacted with Neem cake and Carbendazim amendments effect on Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici of tomato

Hussein Ali Salim; Sobita Simon 2015

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-da9ea08c724c6613cb6f5322ba09f8c772bc4e6e5bfeb9986a8380a2bceb87cc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

solarization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 203 positive, 88 negative or no effect

202 papers in the same direction as this claim · 87 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

282 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.