Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spraying 3.0% urea was more effective for fruit quality than 2.0%.

A claim from Effect Of Winter Spraying Of Urea On Valencia Orange Treesscript title already exists · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 3.0% urea was more effective for fruit quality than 2.0%.

Taxon
Valencia orange treesCitrus sinensise0
Treatment
Spraying urea at 3.0%e1
Outcome
qualitye1
Direction
more effectivee1
Comparator
spraying it at 2.0%e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Valencia orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–204
e1

“Spraying urea at 3.0% was more effective than spraying it at 2.0% on the yield and the quality of valencia orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–661
e2

“The difference between spraying it at 2.0% and 3.0% was statistically of significant on all of the properties of valencia orange trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–797

Title

Effect Of Winter Spraying Of Urea On Valencia Orange Treesscript title already exists

Fatma Abdelhameed Mohamed; Abd El-Hameed Wassel; Faroukh Abdelaziz Minia Journal of Agricultural Research and Development 2022. doi:10.21608/mjard.2022.124390.1004

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-db24d14520f9cb4e2c7b433696336c197ef5f34c6edbf55ebf3c75f6483c04ea · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · quality: general · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

application · quality: general · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.