Claim · model-written summary
Damage was lowest after nematode spray followed by tine cultivation.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- sprayed with nematodes and subsequently cultivated with tinese0
- Outcome
- Damagee0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Damage to winter wheat was lowest in plots that had been sprayed with nematodes and subsequently cultivated with tines or Roterra”
Title
B. Hass; L. A. Hughes; D. M. Glen Biocontrol Science and Technology 1999. doi:10.1080/09583159929532
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Nematode treated winter wheat had significantly less slug damage than wheat treated with metaldehyde pellets.
- Intervention effect Nematode treated winter wheat had significantly less slug damage than wheat treated with methiocarb pellets.
- Intervention effect Nematode treated winter wheat had significantly less slug damage than untreated plots.
- Intervention effect Harrowing after nematode application did not significantly change plant damage.
- Intervention effect Metaldehyde pellets did not significantly reduce plant damage versus untreated plots.
- Intervention effect Methiocarb pellets did not significantly reduce plant damage versus untreated plots.
- Intervention effect Nematode application before tine cultivation significantly reduced the number of damaged plants.
- Intervention effect Nematode application before Roterra cultivation significantly reduced the number of damaged plants.
- Intervention effect Nematodes applied before Dutzi cultivation appeared ineffective.
- Intervention effect Damage was lowest after nematode spray followed by Roterra cultivation.