Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Slow-developing drought raised xylem sap sugar from 1 to 3 g/L, priming the stem for recovery.

A claim from Do the ends justify the means? Impact of drought progression rate on stress response and recovery in Vitis vinifera · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slow-developing drought raised xylem sap sugar from 1 to 3 g/L, priming the stem for recovery.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Material
Grenachee0
Treatment
slow‐developing droughte0
Outcome
sugar accumulatione1
Direction
accumulatione1
Value
from 1 to 3 g L −1e1
Comparator
fast‐developing droughte0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grenache Vitis vinifera cultivar was exposed to either fast‐developing drought (within few days; FDD), typical of pot experiments, or slow‐developing drought (few weeks, SDD), more typical for natural conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–566
e1

“xylem sap acidification from 6 to 5.5 pH and sugar accumulation from 1 to 3 g L −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1088

Title

Do the ends justify the means? Impact of drought progression rate on stress response and recovery in Vitis vinifera

Cristina Morabito; Jessica Orozco; Giulia Tonel; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2021. doi:10.1111/ppl.13590

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-dc9af7310248edc86577538e9171a39a90aca2693bf9feb76f05ce8642216280 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

drought · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 13 positive, 6 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.