Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Dibber drilling increased lettuce emergence rate, uniformity and seedling numbers over coulter drilling.

A claim from The combined effects of a newly designed dibber drill, irrigation and seed covering treatments on lettuce and calabrese establishment · 1991

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dibber drilling increased lettuce emergence rate, uniformity and seedling numbers over coulter drilling.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
dibber drille0
Outcome
rate and uniformity of seedling emergence and the numbers of seedlings emerginge0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
coulter drille0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With lettuce, the rate and uniformity of seedling emergence and the numbers of seedlings emerging were greater following sowing with the dibber drill than with the coulter drill”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–461

Title

The combined effects of a newly designed dibber drill, irrigation and seed covering treatments on lettuce and calabrese establishment

W. E. FINCH‐SAVAGE; M. RAYMENT; F. R. BROWN Annals of Applied Biology 1991. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1991.tb05646.x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-de50d4533b4fa604bd735fdd11ab8cfff7ed6791336b4efc2d57f81e2080d532 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

transplanting · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.