Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Most tests did not show an effect of biostimulant treatment on soybean seed physiological quality.

A claim from Physiological quality of soybean seeds coming from cultivation with application of biostimulant · 2017

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most tests did not show an effect of biostimulant treatment on soybean seed physiological quality.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
foliar application of biostimulant with doses of 0, 250, 500, 750 and 1,000 mL ha -1 in V 5 and R 2e1
Outcome
seed physiological qualitye0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
0e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“soybean seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–38
e0

“However, most of tests did not affect seed physiological quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1319
e1

“foliar application of biostimulant with doses of 0, 250, 500, 750 and 1,000 mL ha -1 in V 5 and R 2 on soybean plants does not influence the quality of the seeds produced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1517

Title

Physiological quality of soybean seeds coming from cultivation with application of biostimulant

Amanda Ribeiro Peres; Claudinei Kappes; José Roberto Portugal; et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2017. doi:10.21475/ajcs.17.11.02.p207

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-dfee02dbfb2110dc812a6451d2058f22490d5494c91edafc324c6be85dc2411b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

other · quality: general · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

application · quality: general · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.