Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 150 kg ha −1 seed by 150 kg ha −1 fertilizer interaction gave the highest net benefit, 42,182 ETB ha −1

A claim from The Effect of Seed and Blended Fertilizer Rates on Crop Performance, Fertilizer Use Efficiency, and Economic Benefit of Bread Wheat in Western Ethiopia · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 kg ha −1 seed by 150 kg ha −1 fertilizer interaction gave the highest net benefit, 42,182 ETB ha −1

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
150 kg ha −1 seed rate and 150 kg ha −1 fertilizer ratee4
Outcome
net benefite4
Direction
higheste4
Value
42,182 ETB ha −1e4
Comparator
the other treatmentse4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The interaction between the 150 kg ha −1 seed rate and 150 kg ha −1 fertilizer rate provided a higher number of tillers and grain yields with good fertilizer agronomic efficiency (24.7 kg kg −1 ) and the highest net benefit (42,182 ETB ha −1 ) and marginal rate of return (63976.0%) compared to the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1374
e0

“for profitable bread wheat production in the study area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–501

Title

The Effect of Seed and Blended Fertilizer Rates on Crop Performance, Fertilizer Use Efficiency, and Economic Benefit of Bread Wheat in Western Ethiopia

Hambissa Sabanbon; Mohammed Adem; Jima Duga International Journal of Agronomy 2026. doi:10.1155/ioa/5961852

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-dff400a3ac341c49a6ce0c8c08795037c6db1e4049f6986730f4615f2ce4cb67 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this claim · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

489 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this claim · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.