Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Biofertilizer did not increase pear leaf N content.

A claim from Changes in leaf nutrient content and quality of pear fruits by biofertilizer application in northeastern Italy · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer did not increase pear leaf N content.

Treatment
biofertilizer applicationt0
Outcome
content of this nutrient did not increase in leavese0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but the content of this nutrient did not increase in leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–813
t0

“Changes in leaf nutrient content and quality of pear fruits by biofertilizer application in northeastern Italy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–110

Title

Changes in leaf nutrient content and quality of pear fruits by biofertilizer application in northeastern Italy

Barbara Elen Perazzoli; Volnei Pauletti; Maurizio Quartieri; et al. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 2020. doi:10.1590/0100-29452020530

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e040a1fcf1324f8b38547d7d02c4636c4b2be4efd0c77a853715812ef9c20e01 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

inoculation · nutrient: content · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.