Paper · 2020 · Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura

Changes in leaf nutrient content and quality of pear fruits by biofertilizer application in northeastern Italy

Barbara Elen Perazzoli; Volnei Pauletti; Maurizio Quartieri; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
15
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this study was to verify the influence of biofertilizer application resulting from energy production from corn biomass on nutrient uptake by pear plants during the growing cycle, and on fruit quality. The experiment was carried out on a Siltic Haplic Calcisol in the Italian province of Ferrara, in a medium-density Abbé Fétel commercial orchard. Treatments consisted of control (no application) and biofertilizer (30 m3 ha-1 biofertilizer application on the row), with four replicates. The following variables were evaluated: mineral N, microbial biomass and respiration in soil; nutrient content in leaves; and fruit quality. Biofertilizer application increased soil mineral N availability; soil microbial biomass and respiration, but the content of this nutrient did not increase in leaves. Leaf nutrient concentration varied during growth season and biofertilizer application increased potassium, phosphorus and zinc concentration in mature leaves and reduced leaf magnesium and manganese concentration. Biofertilizer application reduced fruit dry matter content, total soluble solids and boron concentration, with no effect on fruit firmness and titratable acidity. Biofertilizer application has positive effect on soil mineral N dynamics and soil microflora, altering the content of nutrients in leaves, favoring fruit production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer increased soil mineral N availability, microbial biomass, and respiration.

Treatment
Biofertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
soil mineral N availability; soil microbial biomass and respiratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biofertilizer application increased soil mineral N availability; soil microbial biomass and respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer did not increase pear leaf N content.

Treatment
biofertilizer applicationt0
Outcome
content of this nutrient did not increase in leavese0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but the content of this nutrient did not increase in leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Changes in leaf nutrient content and quality of pear fruits by biofertilizer application in northeastern Italy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pear leaf nutrient concentration varied during the growth season.

Outcome
Leaf nutrient concentratione0
Direction
variede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf nutrient concentration varied during growth season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer increased potassium, phosphorus, and zinc concentration in mature pear leaves.

Organ / stage
mature leavese0
Treatment
biofertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
potassium, phosphorus and zinc concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biofertilizer application increased potassium, phosphorus and zinc concentration in mature leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer reduced magnesium and manganese concentration in pear leaves.

Treatment
biofertilizer applicationt0
Outcome
leaf magnesium and manganese concentratione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced leaf magnesium and manganese concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“Changes in leaf nutrient content and quality of pear fruits by biofertilizer application in northeastern Italy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer reduced pear fruit dry matter content, soluble solids, and boron concentration.

Treatment
Biofertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
fruit dry matter content, total soluble solids and boron concentratione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biofertilizer application reduced fruit dry matter content, total soluble solids and boron concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer had no effect on pear fruit firmness or titratable acidity.

Treatment
biofertilizer applicationt0
Outcome
fruit firmness and titratable aciditye0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with no effect on fruit firmness and titratable acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“Changes in leaf nutrient content and quality of pear fruits by biofertilizer application in northeastern Italy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret biofertilizer as favoring pear fruit production.

Outcome
fruit productione0
Direction
favoringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“favoring fruit production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1355 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–59 · show in text ↑

inoculation · nutrient: content · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.