Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrogen levels and sources had non-significant effects on available micronutrients.

A claim from Effect of different levels and sources of nitrogen on chemical properties of sodic soil under spinach cultivation · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen levels and sources had non-significant effects on available micronutrients.

Treatment
different levels (40, 80 and 100 kg N ha-1) of urea and ammonium sulphatee1
Outcome
available micronutrientse1
Direction
non-significante1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“under spinach cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–113
e1

“among different levels (40, 80 and 100 kg N ha-1) of urea and ammonium sulphate on soil pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, calcium carbonate, available phosphorous, available potassium and available micronutrients were found non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–516

Title

Effect of different levels and sources of nitrogen on chemical properties of sodic soil under spinach cultivation

GH Yashaswini; BM Kamble; AG Durgude; et al. International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research 2025. doi:10.33545/26174693.2025.v9.i10sn.5972

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e06c484c7731005be4168ddc266a40c1511359b74f2e5cb19b0e25b0f488442d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 14 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.